Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;36(4):265–274. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1082

Table IV.

Hypesthesia and dysesthesia in areas of innervation of V1/V2 after orbital decompression reported in the literature.

Authors Surgical technique Number
of
patients
Number
of orbits
Number of
transient V1
hypoesthesia
Number of
permanent V1
hypoesthesia
Number of
transient V2
hypoesthesia
Number of
permanent V2
hypoesthesia
Bailey et al. 28 3-walls 55 97 5 (5%)
Barkhuysen et
al. 43
3-walls (transconjunctival approach) 7 14 2 (14.3%) 1 (7.1%)
Carrasco et al. 44 63 orbits: TA
65 orbits: transconjunctival approach
75 128 29 (46%) WO
4 (6.1%)
transconj
De Santo 23 TA 200 399 200 (50%) 10 (2.5%)
Garrity et al. 3 TA 428 851 Frequent 23 (2.7%)
Goh et al. 45 10 orbits: lateral wall
65 orbits: medial and lateral wall
5 orbits: medial wall and floor
2 orbits: lateral wall and floor
69 orbits: medial, lateral and floor
88 151 15 (9.9%) 1 (0.7%)
Jernfors et al. 10 TA / Transnasal endoscopic approach 78 144 25 (32%)
Kalmann et al. 4 3-walls (coronal approach) 125 250 Almost all 1 (0.4%) 6 (2.4%) 1 (0.4%)
Kingdom et al. 46 3-walls 77 114 1 (0.9%)
Liao et al. 47 Transforniceal 35 62 2 (3.2%) 1 (1.6%)
Lund et al. 40 35 orbits: Patterson's approach
24 orbits: endoscopic approach
33 59 4 (6.8%)
Maroon et al. 26 4-walls (ext) 4 7 1 (14.3%)
Michel et al. 48 Endoscopic approach 78 145 4 (2.8%)
Olivari 21 Fat removal 57 108 2 (1.9%) 5 (4.6%)
Sasim et al. 27 92 orbits: coronal approach
47 orbits: swinging eyelid approach
74 139 5% of the
coronal
approach
25% of the
swinging eyelid
approach
Tjon et al. 49 TA 75 3 (4%)
Warren et al. 24 TA 305 610 20% 5%

TA: transantral.