Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 30;14(8):1705–1715. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12531

Table 1.

Comparison of the grain yield, dry weight and agronomic nitrogen‐use efficiency (ANUE) between the wild‐type (WT) and transgenic lines in the T1–T3 generations

WT pUBi:OsNRT2.1 pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1
OE1 OE2 OE3 O6 O7 O8
Grain yield (kg/m2)
T1 0.52 b 0.42 c 0.44 c 0.43 c 0.69 a 0.69 a 0.71 a
T2 0.66 b 0.54 c 0.56 c 0.54 c 0.89 a 0.91 a 0.93 a
T3 0.70 b 0.58 c 0.60 c 0.57 c 0.94 a 0.98 a 1.00 a
Dry weight (kg/m2)
T1 1.05 c 1.31 b 1.29 b 1.31 b 1.43 a 1.45 a 1.47 a
T2 1.27 c 1.55 b 1.61 b 1.58 b 1.77 a 1.83 a 1.77 a
T3 1.40 c 1.67 b 1.73 b 1.69 b 1.91 a 1.96 a 1.95 a
ANUE (g/g)
T1 15.48 b 12.43 c 12.94 c 12.56 c 19.64 a 19.63 a 19.86 a
T2 20.28 b 16.46 c 17.02 c 16.25 c 26.41 a 26.71 a 27.50 a
T3 21.33 b 17.42 c 18.41 c 17.01 c 26.17 a 27.86 a 28.12 a

Dry weight mean values are for all aboveground biomass, including the grain yield. For each mean, n = 3. Significant differences between the transgenic lines and WT are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05, one‐way ANOVA).