Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Radiol. 2015;2015:206405. doi: 10.1155/2015/206405

Table 1.

Summary of pH measurement methods with various instruments.

Method Sampling time
Spatial resolution
Agent [C]
Advantages and disadvantages Reference
Microelectrode Fast, sec
Localized measurement
No agent required
Fast; accurate if calibrated with an external buffer
Limited to surface-accessible tumors; requires MRI to guide electrodes into tumors
[1618]
Fluorescence imaging Fast, sec
5 μm
μM–nM
Sensitive; low cost; can be used during clinical fluorescence guided surgery
Limited to surface-accessible tumors
[14,1921, 2529]
PET 10 min
2 mm
nM
Fast; whole body imaging
Requires radioactive isotope; coarse resolution; and limited accuracy
[2224, 31]
1H MRS >30 min
1mm3
mM
Simultaneous measurement of pHe and detection of metabolites
Poor sensitivity; some agents are pH buffers that change tissue pHe
[34, 39, 40]
31P MRS 40 min
1cm3
mM
Can simultaneously measure pHi and pHe
Requires a 31P MRI transceiver coil
[41, 4346]
19F MRS 5 min
1cm3
μM–mM
Fast; good sensitivity
Requires a 19F MRI transceiver coil
[42, 47, 49]
Hyperpolarized 13C MRS 5 sec
0.375 mm3
mM
Very fast
Requires a 13C MRI transceiver coil; requires a hyperpolarizer instrument Short hyperpolarized 13C life time;
Measures pHi and pHe
[48]
pH dependent T1 relaxation <1 min
0.1 mm3
mM
Fast; high resolution
Requires a cocktail of contrast agents
[5053]
CEST MRI ~5 min
μm–mm
mM
Good specificity
Poor sensitivity
[37]