Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep-Oct;42(5):883–896. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0446

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

First author [reference] Country/Region Ethnicity Genotyping method Cases (age) Controls (age) Design of Experiment NOS score
Kim (2005) (19) Korea Asian PCR-RFLP N=153 (62.9±11.8 years) N=153 (60.7±11.8 years) Hospital-based 6
Karahalil (2006) (20) Turkey Caucasian PCR-RFLP N=100 (mean age 59.87 years) N=100 (mean age 59.33 years) Hospital-based 6
Huang (2007) (21) USA Caucasian Taqman N=696 (63.94±11.17 years) N=629 (62.77±10.50 years) Hospital-based 7
Figueroa (2007) (22) Spain Caucasian Taqman N=1150 (66±10 years) N=1149 (65±10 years) Hospital-based 6
Arizono (2008) (23) Japan Asian PCR-RFLP N=251 (68.2±11.2 years) N=251 (68.1±11.7 years) Population-based 6
Narter (2009) (10) Turkey Caucasian PCR-RFLP N=83 (63.43±11.74 years) N=45 (59.98±9.71 years) Hospital-based 7
Wang (2011) (24) Taiwan Asian PCR-RFLP N=460 (62.7±10.9 years) N=540 (61.9±11.0 years) Hospital-based 7
Mittal (2011) (30) India Asian ARMS-PCR N=212 (59.6±12.4 years) N=250 (58.8±10.8 years) Hospital-based 6
Ma (2012) (27) China Asian TaqMan N=1050 (65±5 years) N=1404 (65±5 years) Hospital-based 6
Ramaniuk (2014) (28) Belarus Caucasian PCR-RFLP N=336 (67.0±10.7 years) N=370 (64.5±13.5 years) Hospital-based 8