| Affenito et al, 2013 [23], USA, General Mills |
Third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study |
N = 2298, 5–18 y |
24-h dietary recall |
|
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Albertson and Tobelmann, 1993 [7], USA, General Mills |
Market Research Corporation of America Menu Census Panel Survey 1986–1987 and 1987–1988 |
N = 824, 7–12 y |
14-day food diary |
> 7 times vs 2–6 times vs < 2 times/14 d |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage of population consuming less than 100% RDA |
| Albertson et al, 2003 [36], USA, General Mills |
|
N = 603, 4–12 y |
14-day food diary, minimum of 7 days had to be filled in |
≥ 8 serving vs ≤3 serving/14 d |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Albertson et al, 2011 [27], USA, General Mills |
NHANES 2001–2006 |
N = 9660, 6–18 y |
24-h dietary recall |
≥ 1 serving/day vs non |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Albertson et al, 2012 [25], USA, General Mills |
National Eating Trends 2006–2008 |
N = 1759, ≥ 55 y |
14-day food diary |
> 8 serving vs 0 serving/14 d; to be assigned to the “whole grain” category the first grain ingredient in the product must be a whole grain. |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Albertson et al, 2013 [44], USA, General Mills |
NHANES, 2003–2008 |
N = 4737, 4–12 y Food secure and not food secure |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Albertson et al, 2013 [46], Canada, General Mills |
2003–2004 |
N = 2026, ≥ 12 y |
7-day food diary |
≥ 4 serving vs 2–3 serving vs 0–1 serving/7 d |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Barr et al, 2013 [24], Canada, Kellogg |
Canadian Community Health Survey 2004 |
n = 19913, ≥ 19 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Barr et al, 2014 [22], Canada, Kellogg |
Canadian Community Health Survey, 2004 |
N = 12281, 4–18 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RETC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Bertrais et al, 2000 [9], France, in part by Kellogg |
”Supplementation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants” cohort |
N = 2188 men, 45–60 y; N = 2,851 women, 35–60 y |
12 x 24-h dietary recalls averaged |
RTEC breakfast on 0–1 d vs 2–5 d vs 6–9 d vs 10–12 d/12 d |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Deshmukh-Taskar et al, 2010 [29], USA, in part by Kellogg |
NHANES 1999–2006 |
N = 4320, 9–13 y; N = 5,339, 14–18 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Deshmukh-Taskar et al, 2010 [28], USA, USDA Agricultural Research Service |
NHANES 1999–2002 |
N = 2615, 20–39 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Galvin et al, 2002 [37], Ireland, in part by Kellogg |
North/South Ireland Food Consumption Survey 1997–1999 |
N = 1379, 18–64 y |
7-day food diary |
0 g vs on average 28 g/d |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage receiving less than EAR |
| Grieger et al, 2012 [26], Australia, Kellogg |
Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2007 |
N = 781 boys, 12–16 y |
Two 24-h food recalls |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, probability of not achieving 100% of EAR |
| Grieger et al, 2013 [45], Australia, Kellogg |
Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey.2007 |
N = 4487, 2–16 y |
Two 24-h food recalls |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Dietary fiber intake |
| Kafatos et al, 2005 [35], Crete, Kellogg |
1992 |
N = 392, 15 ± 0.4 y |
24-h dietary recall, FFQ for RTEC consumption |
6–5 times vs 1–4 times vs < 1/week |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Koo et al, 2014 [21], Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
|
N = 382, 10–11 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| McNulty et al, 1996 [39], Northern Ireland, Kellogg |
1990/1991 |
N = 1015, 12 and 15 y |
Dietary history method |
> 40 g vs 0 g/day |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage not achieving LRNI |
| Montenegro-Bethancourt et al, 2009 [30], Guatemala, Kellogg |
2005 |
N = 449 boys, 8–10 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Morgan et al, 1981 [43], USA, not stated |
1977 |
N = 657, 5–12 y |
7-day food diaries |
≥ 3 times vs < 3 times vs 0 times/7 day at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Morgan et al, 1986 [48], USA, not stated |
Nationwide Food Consumption Survey 1977–78 |
N = 11082, 1–17 y |
3-day dietary record |
≥ 2 times RTEC vs no RTEC/3 days at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Nicklas et al, 1995 [42], USA, in part by Kellogg |
Bogalusa Heart Study 1984–1985, 1987–1988 and 1988–1991 |
N = 568, 10 y; N = 504, 19–28 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage of population receiving less than 2/3 of RDA |
| Ortega et al, 1996 [41], Spain, The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institutes of Health |
|
N = 200, 9–13 y |
weighed food record over 5 consecutive days |
Every day RTEC vs never RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, micronutrient status |
| Papoutsou et al, 2014 [20], Cyprus, European Community within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme |
IDEFICS study 2007–2008 |
N = 1558, 4–8 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage of population receiving less than 2/3 of RDA |
| Preziosi et al, 1999 [38], France, Kellogg |
|
N = 1108, 2–65 y |
Dietary history method |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, micronutrient status |
| Ruxton et al, 1996 [40], Scotland, Kellogg |
1991 |
N = 136, 7–8 y |
7-d weighed food record |
6–7 times RTEC vs 4–5 times RTEC vs 0–3 times RTEC/week at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, |
| Sampson et al, 1995 [47], USA, General Mills |
1989 |
N = 1151, 7–10 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage of population consuming less than 80% RDA |
| Song et al, 2005 [34], USA, Kellogg |
NHANES 1999–2000 |
N = 4219, ≥ 19 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Song et al, 2006 [32], USA, in part by Kellogg |
NHANES 1999–2000 |
N = 7403, ≥ 4 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RTEC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake, calcium intake |
| Van den Boom et al, 2006 [33], Spain, Kellogg |
enKid study |
N = 2852 (without underreporters), 2–24 y |
24-h dietary recall |
> 40 g vs 21–40 g vs 1–20 g vs 0 g/day |
Energy, nutrient intake, percentage of population receiving less than 2/3 of RDA |
| Williams et al, 2009 [31], USA, in part by Kellogg |
NHANES, 1999–2002 |
N = 1389, 1–12 y |
24-h dietary recall |
RTEC vs no RETC at breakfast |
Energy, nutrient intake |
| Yeung et al, 2011 [49], USA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
NHANES 2003–2006 |
N = 7161, 1–18 y |
24-h dietary recall |
Folic acid enriched grain consumers (ECGP) vs ECGP + RTEC consumers vs ECGP + folic acid supplements (SUP) consumers vs ECGP+SUP+RTEC consumers |
Folic-acid consumption, serum folate, red blood cell folate, serum vitamin B-12 |
