Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun 16;51(5):656–663. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.008

Table 1.

School-Level Demographics, Policies (2006 and 2012), Student Soda Intake, and Weight (2007 and 2013)

2006
(n=50)
2012
(n=50)

Percent (N) or
Mean (SE)
Percent (N)
or Mean (SE)
School demographics
Rural location 86.0% (43) 86.0% (43)
Minority enrollment 9.7% (1.5) 14.4% (2.1)
Free or reduced price lunch eligibility 29.6% (2.0) 35.6% (2.1)
School policy/practice
Fruits or vegetables available in school stores
or vending machines
53.9% (21) 48.7% (19)
Sum of less healthy foods and drinks available
in school stores or vending machinesa
4.3 (0.2) 2.9 (0.3)
PE required in ninth grade 85.7% (42) 93.9% (46)
Intramural options or activity clubs available 42.0% (21) 42.0% (21)
Policy/practice summaryb 2.6 (0.2) 3.7 (0.3)
Ninth grade student soda intake and weight
(averaged within schools)
2007 2013
Soda servings, daily 1.4 (0.06) 1.2 (0.04)
BMI percentile 0.61 (0.01) 0.61 (0.01)
Obese 9% (0.01) 10% (0.01)
a

Sum of less healthy foods and drinks available: Salty snacks, Candy, Chocolate candy, Soda pop, Sports drinks (maximum obtainable value of 5).

b

Policy summary score was calculated as follows: having fruits or vegetables available (1-item), PE required (1-item), intramural opportunities available (1-item) (yes=1); for each less healthy food or drink available (5-items) (no=1). Higher score is better (maximum obtainable value of 8).

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05)

PE, physical education