. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun 7;51(5):e119–e127. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.019

Table 3.

Difference in Mean BMI Between Participants Bypassing and Not Bypassing Nearby Resources^a

Neighborhood resource	Euclidean distance (d, miles)			Driving time (t, min)
	No bypassing du ≤ 1.0	Bypassing du >1.0	p-value	No bypassing tu ≤ 5.0	Bypassing tu >5.0	p-value
	BMI (kg/m2) ± se		p-value	BMI (kg/m2) ± se		p-value
Grocery store	31.0 ± 0.6 (n = 116)	33.2 ± 0.8 (n = 114)	0.02*	31.2 ± 0.5 (n = 169)	33.3 ± 1.0 (n = 85)	0.03*

Pharmacy	32.1 ± 1.2 (n = 39)	31.7 ± 0.9 (n = 33)	0.6	32.3 ± 0.9 (n = 80)	34.5 ± 0.9 (n = 73)	0.04*

Outpatient provider	30.5 ± 1.9 (n = 16)	32.1 ± 0.6 (n = 189)	0.2	31.0 ± 1.5 (n = 24)	32.3 ± 0.5 (n = 211)	0.2

Place of worship	31.4 ± 1.0 (n = 52)	33.3 ± 0.9 (n = 89)	0.07	31.1 ± 0.9 (n = 62)	33.7 ± 0.9 (n = 82)	0.02*

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (*p<0.05).

For all resource types, this analysis was restricted to only those participants with ‘nearby’ resources, defined as ≤1 mile in the distance analysis (left) and ≤5 minutes in the time analysis (right). Participants without any nearby resources were excluded from each analysis.