Table 5.

Performance of original CTP (oCTP), modified CTP (mCTP), simplified modified CTP (mCTP₁₃), Taiwanese-proposed modification of CTP (Huo CTP), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), Veteran’s Aging Cohort Study (VACS) in predicting 5-year transplant-free survival in specific disease etiology subsets

Regressor	Unit	HR	Harrell’s C	R 2	LR test	Wald	Logrank
eCTP	per unit change	1.49 (1.48–1.50)	0.701 ± 0.002	0.213	7394	8711	9188
mCTP	per unit change	1.53 (1.52–1.54)	0.709 ± 0.002	0.232	8172a	9842	10,413
mCTP13	per unit change	1.60 (1.58–1.61)	0.709 ± 0.002	0.231	8110a	9330	9939
mCTP-Cr	per unit change	1.57 (1.56–1.59)	0.712 ± 0.002	0.242	8563a	10,225	10,687
Huo CTP	per unit change	1.47 (1.46–1.48)	0.695 ± 0.002	0.211	7306	8716	8974
MELD	per unit change	1.10 (1.09–1.10)	0.639 ± 0.002	0.110	3608a	4230	4240
VACS	per 10 unit change	1.32 (1.31–1.33)	0.670 ± 0.002	0.156	5246a	5602	5605
eCTP class	B versus A	2.48 (2.40–2.57)	0.682 ± 0.002	0.180	6132	6925	8112
	C versus A	7.35 (6.96–7.77)
mCTP class	B versus A	2.80 (2.71–2.90)	0.693 ± 0.002	0.205	7090	8004	9564
	C versus A	8.91 (8.42–9.43)
mCTP-Cr class	B versus A	2.88 (2.79–2.98)	0.690 ± 0.002	0.196	6733	7514	8845
	C versus A	9.84 (9.21–10.50)

^a p < 0.0001 for difference of LR test by ANOVA with eCTP