Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 18;7:1588. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01588

Table 2.

Comparison of DNA and RNA co-extraction methods and kits, tested on soils FH (high pH peat, pH 7.39), FL (low pH peat, pH 3.65), and Å (low pH clay soil, pH 5.5).

Method/Kit
Nicolaisen’s methoda
MPb
PMb
PS + AKb
Optimized method
TNA purification prior to digestc
-
+
-
+
+
Soils tested FH FL Å FH FL FH FL FH FL Å FH FL Å
Amplifiable DNAd + + + + + + + + ±f + + + +
Complete removal of DNA after 1st digestiond,e + - - + - + - + - - + + -
Complete removal of DNA after 2nd digestiond,e + - - + ±f + - + - + + + +
cDNA synthesis + NT NT + ±f + NT + NT + + + +

aMethod from Nicolaisen et al. (2008).

bSee Table 1 for list of kit abbreviations.

cTNA purification with the OPIR kit.

dSee text for details on DNA amplification and removal assessment.

eDNA was digested with TURBO DNase, and RCC kit was used for purification after each digestion.

fResults from replicates varied, likely due to the presence of inhibitory compounds.

gDNA, genomic DNA; NT, not tested because of residual gDNA.