Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 May 31;25(10):1066–1072. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5662

Table 1.

Characteristics of Women Who Delivered Live Births by Assisted Reproductive Technology Status, Massachusetts and Michigan (N = 384,390)

ART user% (n) N = 6675 Nonuser% (n) N = 377,715 p-valuea
Mean age (years) 35.4 (SD = 5.0) 28.1 (SD = 6.1) <0.001
Education (years)
 High school or less 14.7 (979) 55.0 (206,767) <0.001
 More than high school 85.3 (5675) 45.0 (169,098)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 86.6 (5770) 72.3 (272,785) <0.001
 Other 13.4 (892) 27.7 (104,609)
Prenatal care
 First trimester 89.2 (5841) 78.2 (286,128) <0.001
 Second trimester or later 10.8 (705) 21.8 (79,851)
Parity
 0 54.0 (3580) 42.4 (159,442) <0.001
 1 or more 46.0 (3052) 57.6 (216,817)
a

Statistical significance by ART status determined using t-test for maternal age and chi-square test for categorical variables (p < 0.05).

ART, assisted reproductive technology; SD, standard deviation.