Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;82(20):6174–6188. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01813-16

TABLE 3.

Adjusted P values for AB5075 growth following copper priminga

Copper priming concn (μM) comparison P value
2 h 3 h
0 vs 1 0.9884 0.9481
0 vs 2.5 0.0452 0.0038
0 vs 5 0.0096 <0.0001
0 vs 10 <0.0001 <0.0001
0 vs 100 <0.0001 <0.0001
1 vs 2.5 0.1961 0.0527
1 vs 5 0.0571 0.0004
1 vs 10 <0.0001 <0.0001
1 vs 100 <0.0001 <0.0001
2.5 vs 5 0.9943 0.6264
2.5 vs 10 0.0023 0.0006
2.5 vs 100 <0.0001 0.0006
5 vs 10 0.0131 0.0737
5 vs 100 <0.0001 0.0784
10 vs 100 0.5352 >0.9999
a

Differences in growth were evaluated among priming conditions for each time point by using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons. No significance was found at 0, 4, 5, or 6 h. P values of <0.05 are highlighted in bold.