Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 13;2(4):223–233. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.51

Table 3.

Multi‐variate analysis: linear regression analysis for FGFR1 and 2 protein expression and logistic regression for FGFR3 protein expression with clinicopathological variables in non‐small cell lung cancer

Variable FGFR1a FGFR2a FGFR3b
FGFR1a NA pos, p = 0.0005 pos p = 0.24
FGFR2a pos, p = 0.0005 NA neg p = 0.83
FGFR3b pos, p = 0.21 neg, p = 0.61 NA
Genderc pos, p = 0.46 pos, p = 0.01 neg, p = 0.69
Age at diagnosisd pos, p = 0.50 neg, p = 0.26 pos, p = 0.17
Smoking statuse neg, p = 0.17 pos, p = 0.58 pos, p = 0.008
SCC versus AC neg, p = 0.002 neg, p < 10−7 pos, p < 10−6
LCC versus AC neg, p = 0.47 neg, p = 0.10 pos, p = 0.15
Tumour stage pos, p = 0.31 neg, p = 0.30 neg, p = 0.98

Direction of association and adjusted p‐values are given.

a

Per 10%‐point increase.

b

Dichotomized into negative (0) and positive (1+/2+).

c

Female versus male.

d

Per year.

e

FGFR1 and 2 as heavy versus light smoking; FGFR3 as PY.

SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; LCC, large cell carcinoma.