Table 1. Two-way ANOVA comparing behavioural data (DBS and Stress as independent factors).
| DBS | Stress | DBS × stress | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSFT | F(1,25)=0.6; P=0.4 | F(1,25)= 4.7; P= 0.04 | F(1,25)= 10.6; P= 0.003 |
| FST | F(1,33)=2.2; P=0.14 | F(1,33)=2.6; P=0.11 | F(1,33)=4.7; P=0.04 |
| EPMT | F(1,30)=0.14; P=0.7 | F(1,30)=2.6; P=0.1 | F(1,30)=6.1; P=0.02 |
| OFT | F(1,25)=1.2; P=0.3 | F(1,25)=1.9; P=0.2 | F(1,25)=0.3; P=0.5 |
| DBS effect | Stress effect | Time effect | |
| SPIa | F(1.26)=0.2; P=0.9 | F(1.26)=48.2; P=0.0001 | F(1.26)=0.3; P=0.8 |
| DBS × time | Stress × time | DBS × Stress × time | |
| SPIa | F(3,78)=1.1; P=0.3 | F(3,78)=3.0; P=0.04 | F(3,78)=3.8; P=0.014 |
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; DBS, deep brain stimulation; EPMT, elevated plus maze test; FST, forced swim test; NSFT, novelty-suppressed feeding test; OFT, open field test; SPI, sucrose preference index.
a
Sucrose preference scores were calculated with repeated measures ANOVA (DBS, Stress, Time as factors).