Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 18;11(10):e0164211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164211

Table 2. Key metabolites emerged from the search on the metabolome databases: PTD Group vs TD Group.

Group RT m/z Adduct Mass error (ppm) AUC ROC (CI 95%) Sp Se Putative metabolites or Metabolite class Fragmentation pattern
PTD Group 2.23 109.0292 [M-H]- 2 0.55–0.99 0.70 0.82 Muconic dialdehyde No fragment
5.06 197.0808 [M-H]- 2.5 0.60–1.00 0.70 0.82 Dicarboxylic unsaturated fatty acid 153.0921, 135.0815, 111.0451
6.63 421.1606 [M-H]- 7 0.63–1.00 0.70 0.82 Amino acid chain No fragment
5.06 179.0699 [M-H]- 8 0.59–0.97 0.60 0.91 3-Methoxybenzenepropanoic acid No fragment
5.05 153.092 [M+H]+ 6 0.67–1.00 0.70 0.82 4-hydroxynonenal alkyne No fragment
0.76 128.0711 [M+H]+ 3 0.53–0.96 0.80 0.64 Hydropyridine No fragment
TD Group 5.28 744.5888 [M+H]+ 1 0.61–1.00 1.00 0.64 Phosphatidylcholine No fragment

RT = Retention Time; m/z = mass-to-charge ratio; ppm = part per million; AUC = Area under the Curve; ROC = receiver operating characteristics; Sp = specificity; Se = sensitivity; the optimal threshold used for specificity and sensitivity is the point closest to the top-left part of the plot with perfect sensitivity or specificity.