Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;7:471. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00471

Table 3.

Characteristics of studies.

References Population MBI program Controls Study duration Intention-to-treat Cortisol assessments Cortisol indicators Other biomarkers Results St Q Tx Q
Klatt et al., 2009 45 university employees Mean age: 43.41 ± 2.17 years (MBSR), 46.50 ± 1.89 years (Control) Gender: male 24%, female 76% (total). MBSR-id (low-dose), (N = 22), 6 weeks programme training of 6 h. Homework: individual sessions for 20′ during the remaining work days. Listen to the daily meditations on the CD four times per week. Adherence workbook and two CDs. Wait-list control (PC) (N = 23). N/A No 30 time points pre and post intervention each 2 consecutive days collected at ~7 a.m., at 1 p.m., and at 10 p.m. once per week during intervention collected at ~7 a.m., at 1 p.m., and at 10 p.m. Average daily values. None Baseline salivary cortisol was higher in the control compared to MBSR-ld group. There were no changes in the average daily levels of salivary cortisol over time in both groups and there were no differences from pre to post intervention. AS (?) AC (?) PK (?) IO (−) Man (+) Trai (?) Inte (?)
Oken et al., 2010 31 caregivers. Mean age: 62.50 ± 11.60 years (Mindfulness), 67.09 ± 8.36 years (Education), 63.80 ± 7.92 years (Respite). Gender: male 19%, female 81% (total). Mindfulness (based MBCT) (N = 10). 6 weeks + common first-week session (total 7 weeks) programme training: 10.5 h. Homework: not declared contents and lengths of time written material and recorded audio instructions. Education (AC) (N = 11). 6 weeks + common first-week session (total 7 weeks) programme training: 10.5 h caregiver help book. Respite (PC) (N = 10) 7 weeks respite care: 3 h N/A No 6 time points pre and post intervention single day collected at within 5′ after awakening, 30′ later before eating, and at bedtime (~10–11 p.m.). Each measured value (including morning levels). IL-6, TNF-α, HS-CRP There were no significant changes among the three groups in the levels of salivary cortisol. AS (−) AC (−) PK (−) IO (?) Man (+) Trai (+) Inte (?)
Jensen et al., 2012 47 healthy (mainly university students). Mean age: 20–36 years (total). Gender: male 34%, female 66% (total). MBSR (N = 16) 8 weeks + intensive retreat (7 h) programme training: 27 h. Homework: formal assignments (45 min) following CDs with guided meditation practices and informal assignments (15 min). NMSR (AC) (N = 15) 8 weeks (not declared intensive retreat) structurally similar to MBSR but did not include meditation practices or training in a non-judgemental attitude. Inactive controls (PC) (N = 16). N/A No 10 time points baseline and post intervention single day collected upon awakening, at 15, 30, 45, 60 min after awakening. CAR: AUCG and AUCI. None The groups did not initially differ on any cortisol measures. At post intervention, MBSR group showed a tendency toward a lower AUCGthan did the inactive controls. MBSR group decreased near-significantly on AUCG, NMSR decreased, and the inactive controls increased within each group. Only MBSR decreased significantly on AUCI, NMSR decreased, and the inactive controls showed no changes. AS (?) AC (?)PK (−)IO (−) Man (+) Trai (+) Inte (?)
Flook et al., 2013 18 teachers. Mean age: 46.70 ± 6.95 years (MBSR-m), 38.50 ± 11.49 years (Control). Gender: male 11%, female 89% (total). MBSR modified (N = 10) 8 weeks + one day-long immersion (6 h) programme training: 26 h. Homework: guided and unguided meditation practices that ranged in duration from 12 to 45 min guided practices following audio CDs. Wait-list control (PC) (N = 8). N/A No 18 time points pre and post intervention each 3 consecutive working days collected at 30′ after awakening, before lunch, and before bed. Morning levels and average daily values. None Both groups showed a marginally significant flattening of diurnal cortisol profiles over time. Although MBSR-m group didn't change the levels of morning salivary cortisol, the control group showed a significant decrease in the levels of that cortisol. AS (?)AC (?) PK (?) IO (?) Man (+) Trai (+) Inte (?)
Rosenkranz et al., 2013 49 community volunteers. Mean age: 44.4 ± 12.37 years (MBSR), 48.9 ± 7.66 years (HEP), Gender: male 20%, female 80% (total). MBSR (N = 28) 8 weeks + one full-day session programme training: 20 h + α. Homework: daily at-home practice that ranged in duration from 45 to 60 min (not declared contents). Health Enhancement Programme: HEP (AC) (N = 21) 8 weeks + one full-day session structurally similar to MBSR consisted of four components: (1) physical activity (2) balance, agility, and core strength (3) nutritional education and (4) music therapy. 4 months Yes 18 time points: TSST pre and post intervention, and 4 months follow-up, single day collected after 20′ rest period, immediately before TSST, immediately after TSST, and subsequent 10′ intervals for 30′ during TSST. 45 time points: at home pre and post intervention, and 4 months follow-up each 3 days collected upon awakening, at 30′ post-awakening, before lunch, at 3 p.m., and before bed. Diurnal slope and daily output (AUCGacross the whole day). blister fluid TNF-α, IL-8 There was neither a significant effect of group, nor a group × time interaction for stress-evoked cortisol response. The slope of the decline in cortisol produced across the day did not differ between the two groups at pre intervention, whereas there was a non-significant trend for the slope to be steeper for MBSR group and less steep for HEP group at post intervention, that became significant at 4 months follow-up. Cortisol AUC showed a main effect of group, where MBSR had lower daily cortisol output across assessments, but no main effect of time or group × time. AS (?) AC (?) PK (?) IO (?) Man (+) Trai (+) Inte (?)

AC, active controls; AUC, area under the curve; AUCG, area under the curve with respect to ground; AUCI, area under the curve with respect to increase from awakening; BMI, body mass index; CAR, cortisol awakening response; CD, compact disc; HS-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; mMBSR, modified mindfulness-based stress reduction; N/A, not available; NMSR, non-mindfulness stress reduction; Non-RCTs, non-randomized controlled trials; PC, passive controls; RCTs, randomized controlled trials; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TSST, the Trier Social Stress Test. ST-Q: study quality. AS, adequate generation of allocation sequence; AC, concealment of allocation to conditions; PK, prevention of knowledge of the allocated intervention; IO, dealing with incomplete outcome data; St Q, Risk of bias (Higgins et al., 2011); Tx Q, Intervention quality; Man, the study referred to the use of a treatment manual; Trai, the therapists who conducted the therapy were trained; Inte, treatment integrity was checked during the study; +, high; −, low; ?, unclear.