. 2016 Oct 1;25(10):1073–1080. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5170

Table 4.

Odds Ratio to Predict Risk of T-Score ≤ −2.5 at the Femoral Neck, with Fitness Modeled Categorically (n = 1,720)

	Model 1: odds ratio (95% CI)^a	p	Model 2: odds ratio (95% CI)^b	p	Model 3: odds ratio (95% CI)^c	p	Model 4: odds ratio (95% CI)^d	p
Moderate fit versus low fit^e	0.51 (0.20–1.28)	0.15	0.28 (0.11–0.75)	0.01	0.28 (0.11–0.76)	0.01	0.30 (0.11–0.80)	0.02
High fit versus low fit^e	0.65 (0.29–1.47)	0.30	0.22 (0.09–0.54)	0.001	0.25 (0.10–0.61)	0.002	0.29 (0.12–0.71)	0.007
Weight (per 5 kg)			0.66 (0.58–0.77)	<0.001	0.66 (0.57–0.77)	<0.001	0.66 (0.57–0.77)	<0.001
Age (per 10 years)					1.81 (1.31–2.50)	<0.001	1.77 (1.28–2.45)	0.001
Resistance activity, 2–7 versus 0–1 days/week							0.60 (0.34–1.07)	0.08

^{^a}

Model 1 unadjusted.

^{^b}

Model 2 adjusted for weight and fitness.

^{^c}

Model 3 adjusted for age, weight, and fitness.

^{^d}

Model 4 adjusted for age, weight, fitness, and resistance activity.

^{^e}

Low fit, category 1 based on age-specific normative data within the CCLS; moderate fit, categories 2 and 3; high fit, categories 4 and 5.