. 2016 Oct 1;25(10):1073–1080. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5170

Table 5.

Odds Ratio to Predict Risk of T-Score ≤ −1.0 and ≤ −2.5 at the Femoral Neck, with Fitness Modeled Categorically, Vitamin D Subgroup (n = 898)

	T-score at femoral neck ≤ −2.5
	T-score at femoral neck ≤ −1.0		T-score at femoral neck ≤ −2.5
	Odds ratio (95% CI)^a	p	Odds ratio (95% CI)^a	p
Age (per 10 years)	1.83 (1.47–2.29)	<0.001	1.49 (0.95–2.35)	0.085
Weight (per 5 kg)	0.75 (0.71–0.80)	<0.001	0.67 (0.55–0.81)	<0.001
Moderate fit versus low fit^b	0.48 (0.26–0.90)	0.022	0.29 (0.08–1.09)	0.067
High fit versus low fit^b	0.32 (0.17–0.59)	<0.001	0.27 (0.08–0.95)	0.041
25-Hydroxyvitamin D (per 5 ng/mL)	0.96 (0.91–1.01)	0.113	1.02 (0.91–1.14)	0.738
Resistance activity, 2–7 versus 0–1 days/week	1.14 (0.85–1.55)	0.385	0.66 (0.31–1.40)	0.278

^{^a}

Model adjusted for age, weight, fitness, vitamin D, and resistance activity.

^{^b}

Low fit, category 1 based on age-specific normative data within the CCLS; moderate fit, categories 2 and 3; high fit, categories 4 and 5.