Table 2.
Item | Oen [9] | Seale and Glickman 2007 [29] | Weber [8] | McBride [35] | Stangvaltaite [7] | Schwendicke [28] | Chisini [34] | Schwendicke [6] | Katz [27] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | |||||||||
Representativeness of the sample | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
Sample size determination | |||||||||
Non-responders | * | * | |||||||
Validity of survey | |||||||||
Checked reliability and internal consistency Survey available | ** | ** | * | ** | |||||
Comparability | * | – | – | – | * | * | * | * | – |
Outcome | |||||||||
Assessment of the outcome | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
Statistical test | * | * | * | * | |||||
Overall | *** | * | *** | ***** | **** | ******* | **** | ****** | ** |
For each risk of bias domain, one to two stars could be collected, with a total number of eight stars being possible. We classified studies as high risk (1–3 stars), moderate risk (4–6 stars), or low risk (7–8 stars)