Table 5.
Multivariate analysis of utilization of LLINs in intervention and comparison villages following COMBI
| LLIN Usage | Coef. | Std. Err. | t | p > t | 95 % Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | ||||||
| Comparison | 0.00 | |||||
| Intervention | 0.59 | 0.03 | 19.49 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| Education | ||||||
| Informal | 0.00 | |||||
| Formal | 0.16 | 0.03 | 4.69 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Government employee | 0.00 | |||||
| Business | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.89 | −0.13 | 0.15 |
| Farmer | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.15 | 0.88 | −0.14 | 0.12 |
| Free job | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.80 | −0.10 | 0.13 |
| Household monthly income | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Household population | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.01 | 0.31 | −0.02 | 0.01 |
| Number of children <5 years | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.8 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.09 |
| Constant | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.93 | 0.35 | −0.09 | 0.24 |