Table 1.
Model | npa | Ln Lb | Estimates of ω | Models compared | LRTc | P Values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Branch model | ||||||
A: one ratio | 175 | −41372.52 | ω = 0.06527 | |||
B: one ratio ω = 1 | 174 | −47529.36 | ω = 1 | B vs. A | 12313.68 | 0.0 |
C: the LWS2 branch has ω2, the LWS1 branch has ω1 | 177 | −41347.92 | ω2 = 0.08202 | A vs. C | 49.2 | 0.0 |
ω1 = 0.02536 | ||||||
D: the LWS2 branch has ω2 = 1 | 176 | −41783.48 | ω2 = 1 | D vs. C | 871.12 | 0.0 |
ω1 = 0.02515 | ||||||
E: each branch has its own ω | 347 | −41045.37 | Variable ω by branch | A vs. E | 654.3 | 0.0 |
Branch-site models | ||||||
G: the LWS2 branch | 178 | −41152.48 | ||||
H: the LWS2 branch has ω = 1 | 177 | −41152.48 | H vs. G | 0.0 | 1.0 |
aNumber of parameters
bThe natural logarithm of the likelihood value
cTwice the log likelihood difference between the two models