Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 4;1(4):e000066. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000066

Table 5.

Field testing of the ESMO-MCBS for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer at the Medical University of Vienna

Analysed treatment Setting Primary EP PFS control PFS gain PFS HR OS control OS gain OS HR Adjustment/remark MCBS MCBS-FT
ADT±early docetaxel (CHAARTED)
Sweeney et al71
Metastatic hormone sensitive OS 11.7 m 8.5 m 0.61 (0.51 to 0.72) 44.0 m 13.6 m 0.61 (0.47 to 0.80) No QOL assessment NA 4
SOC vs SOC+docetaxel vs SOC+zoledronic acid vs SOC+docetaxel+zoledronic Acid (STAMPEDE)
James et al72
High risk locally advanced or metastatic OS





71.0 m 10.0 m
NR
5.0 m
0.78 (0.66 to 0.93)
0.94 (0.79 to 1.11)
0.82 (0.69 to 0.97)
Multiarm, multistage design NA
NA
NA
4

4
Docetaxel+prednisone vs mitoxantrone+prednisone*
Tannock et al73
Castration refractory OS 16.5 m 2.4 m 0.76 (0.62 to 0.94) QOL improved 3 NA
Enzalutamide vs placebo (PREVAIL)*
Beer et al74
Castration-refractory pre-docetaxel PFS, OS 3.2 m >12 m 0.19 (0.15 to 0.23) 30.2 m 2.2 m 0.71, (0.60 to 0.84) QOL improved 3 NA
Standard non-CT or RT±radium-223 (ALSYMPCA)*
Parker et al75
Castration refractory and bone pain/lesions OS 11.3 m 3.6 m 0.70 (0.55 to 0.88) QOL improved 5 NA
Prednisone±abiraterone*
De Bono et al76
Castration refractory after docetaxel OS 10.9 m 3.9 m 0.65 (0.54 to 0.77) 4 NA
Enzalutamide vs placebo (AFFIRM)*
Scher et al77
Castration refractory after docetaxel OS 13.6 m 4.8 m 0.63 (0.53 to 0.75) QOL improved 4 NA
Cabazitaxel+prednisone vs mitoxantrone+prednisone (TROPIC)*
De Bono et al78
Castration refractory after docetaxel OS 12.7 m 2.4 m 0.70 (0.59 to 0.83) 2 NA

*Adapted according to Cherny et al.8

ADT, androgen deprivation treatment; CT, chemotherapy; EP, end point; ESMO-MCBS, European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale; FT, field testing; m, months; NA, not applicable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; QOL, quality of life; RT, radiotherapy; SOC, standard of care.