. 2016 Dec;199:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.013

Table 6.

variation of exponential coefficient PLAPOW (coefficient defining relationship between plant leaf area and node number on the main stem) of 4 genotypes of peanut in different sowing density from field observations (Exp. 4 and 5). (Pla = PLAPOW, CI 95% = 95% Confidence Intervals).

Genotypes	D10			D20			D30			D40
	Pla	CI 95%	R²	Pla	CI 95%	R²	Pla	CI 95%	R²	Pla	CI 95%	R²
Exp.4
ICG 13723	2.57	2.50–2.64	0.79	2.55	2.51–2.60	0.88	2.65	2.60–2.70	0,9	2.57	2.53–2.61	0.88
ICG 2777	2.77	2.72–2.82	0.88	2.75	2.69–2.80	0.83	2.75	2.69–2.80	0,8	2.68	2.62–2.74	0.80
FLEUR 11	2.71	2.66–2.76	0.87	2.77	2.72–2.83	0.83	2.77	2.72–2.82	0,8	2.74	2.67–2.81	0.73
ICG 1834	2.78	2.71–2.84	0.76	2.66	2.60–2.72	0.72	2.71	2.65–2.78	0,8	2.67	2.62–2.72	0.87
All genotypes	2.72	2.69–2.75	0.77	2.70	2.69–2.75	0.77	2.71	2.68–2.74	0.79	2.68	2.65–2.70	0.78
Spanish type (mean)	2.76	2.72–2.80	0.80	2.72	2.72–2.80	0.80	2.74	2.70–2.78	0.80	2.70	2.66–2.74	0.78
Virginia type (mean)	2.68	2.63–2.73	0.76	2.67	2.63–2.73	0.76	2.67	2.63–2.70	0.81	2.63	2.59–2.67	0.78

Exp.5					D25			D33			D50
ICG 4598				2.64	2.61–2.68	0.90	2.71	2.67–2.74	0.91	2.75	2.68–2.81	0.75
ICG 2777				2.63	2.58–2.68	0.75	2.70	2.65–2.75	0.86	2.73	2.66–2.79	0.77
Fleur 11				2.63	2.56–2.69	0.59	2.74	2.68–2.80	0.71	2.75	2.71–2.79	0.89
ICG 1834				2.67	2.59–2.75	0.49	2.71	2.67–2.75	0.84	2.78	2.71–2.85	0.60
All genotypes				2.64	2.62–2.67	0.73	2.71	2.69–2.73	0.85	2.75	2.72–2.77	0.76
Spanish type (mean)				2.65	2.60–2.69	0.52	2.73	2.69–2.76	0.77	2.77	2.73–2.80	0.76
Virginia type (mean)				2.64	2.61–2.67	0.84	2.70	2.67–2.73	0.88	2.74	2.69–2.78	0.76