Table 2:

Performance assessed using a manually reviewed evaluation set for T2DM and MI

T2DM	Cases	Ctrls	Acc	PPV
PheKB definition	152	152	0.92	0.96
Noisy labeling process	152	152	0.89	0.81
XPRESS	152	152	0.89	0.90
MI	Cases	Ctrls	Acc	PPV
OMOP definition	94	94	0.87	0.84
Noisy labeling process	94	94	0.85	0.80
XPRESS	94	94	0.89	0.86

Numbers for “PheKB definition” show the performance of the rule-based definitions for identifying T2DM cases (authored by Vanderbilt University) applied to our database.

Numbers for “OMOP definition” show the performance of the rule-based definitions for identifying MI cases (broad definition with hospitalization) applied to our database.

Numbers in the “Noisy labeling process” row show the performance of the keywords based label assignment.

Numbers against “XPRESS” show the performance of the XPRESS models for identifying cases.