Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jun 24;6(5):287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.06.011

Table 3.

Summary of Study Characteristics Included in Meta-analysis15

Characteristics No. of Studies* Median value or proportion across studies Range of values or proportions across studies
Age, Years 20 53.7 43.0–62.1
Type of IBTR
 DCIS 17 50.0% 0.0–75.0%
 Invasive 17 50.0% 25.0–100.0%
 Unknown 17 0.0% 0.0–7.1%
Screen Detected
 Yes 14 85.8% 45.6–100.0%
 No 14 14.2% 0.0–54.4%
 Unknown 14 0.0% 0.0–2.8%
Grade
 I 13 17.5% 1.8–64.5%
 II 13 28.0% 5.5–45.0%
 I–II 16 57.3% 7.3–92.5%
 III 16 28.4% 3.5–45.6%
 Unknown 16 9.2% 0.0–87.3%
Hormone Receptor
 Positive 5 50.4% 23.0–80.4%
 Negative 5 8.7% 2.8–14.3%
 Unknown 5 40.9% 14.8–69.8%
 WBRT Dose (Gy median) 11 50.0 42.5–50.0
 Radiation Boost 19 70.9% 0.0–100%
 Boost Dose (Gy median) 8 10.0 10.0–10.8

IBTR, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; WBRT, whole breast radiation therapy

*

Number of studies refers to studies contributing information on the characteristic including studies with subsets of patients missing data for the characteristic.

Data from Marinovich ML, Azizi L, Macaskill P, et al. The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016 (In Press)