Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Nov 27;61(1):90–113. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/90

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Images of the gelatin phantom reconstructed with various levels of regularization strength. (A), (B) Spatially constant and (C), (D) spatially varying regularization. The non-uniformity Δ was measured in the ROI shown in (A). Columns correspond to images at matched Δ. The spatially varying penalty achieved reduction in artifacts, sharper edges, and superior noise and resolution homogeneity than the spatially constant penalty at matched Δ.