Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;31(11):1287–1293. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3764-5

Table 3.

PCP, Discharging Physician, and Readmitting Physician Perceptions Regarding Potential Strategies for Preventing Readmission

PCP Disch Admit Concordance
PCP–Disch PCP–-Admit Admit–Disch
n = 305 n = 642 n = 694 n = 190 n = 212 n = 440
No. (%)* n (%) n (%) k k k
Improved self-management plan at discharge 184 (60) 343 (53) 359 (52) 0.22 0.15 0.21
Greater engagement of home and community supports 177 (58) 287 (45) 305 (44) 0.13 0.24 0.18
Provision of resources to manage care and symptoms after discharge 177 (58) 300 (47) 327 (47) 0.28 0.21 0.12
Improved discharge planning 139 (46) 202 (31) 233 (34) 0.09 0.04 0.12
Improved coordination of care between inpatient and outpatient providers 124 (41) 209 (33) 254 (37) 0.13 0.11 0.09
More complete communication of information 112 (37) 166 (26) 209 (30) 0.07 0.00 0.11
Improved attention to medication safety 104 (34) 135 (21) 159 (23) 0.09 0.15 0.13
Improved clarity, timeliness, or availability of information provided at discharge 99 (32) 138 (22) 164 (24) 0.13 0.10 0.07
Average k N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.14 0.13 0.13

Abbreviations: Disch discharging physician, Admit readmitting physician, k kappa statistic

* “No. (%)” represents the number reporting anything other than “no probability” of preventing readmission (i.e. slightly probable, slightly less than 50-50, slightly more than 50-50, strongly probable, nearly certain)