Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 25;33(8):1035–1044. doi: 10.1111/dme.13104

Table 1.

Characteristics of each included RCT

Source Characteristics of participantsa Intervention and control groups Intervention details
Sample sizeb Age, year BMI, kg/m2 Weight, kg Duration, weeks Dietary advice Step goal
Andrews et al., 2011 12 246 60.0 31.6 91.1 Intervention: received pedometer‐based walking interventions and dietary consultation with nurse support. 48 With NS
248 60.1 31.5 90.2 Control: received dietary consultation with nurse support.
Araiza et al., 2006 13 15 49 30.0 NA Intervention: received pedometer‐based walking interventions. 6 Without Yes
15 51 33.5 NA Control: were asked to maintain normal activity habits.
Bjorgaas et al., 2008 14 23 56.4 31.2 94.8 Intervention: received pedometers and were encouraged to increase daily time on walking. 24 Without Yes
25 61.2 31.5 95.2 Control: were encouraged to increase daily time on walking.
De Greef et al., 2010c 15 20 61.3 29 83.5 Intervention: received cognitive–behavioural pedometer‐based interventions. 12 Without Yes
21 61.3 31.5 92.6 Control: received usual care.
De Greef et al., 2011d 16 43 68.3 29.7 NA Intervention: received pedometer‐based physical activity programmes with individual or group counselling. 12 Without Yes
24 66.0 31.5 NA Control: received general care.
Diedrich et al., 2010 17 16 56.7 NA 94.8 Intervention: received pedometer‐based programmes, books (Manpo‐kei) and usual diabetes education. 12 With NS
17 54.9 NA 107.1 Control: received usual diabetes education.
Engel and Linder 2006 18 22 60.5 32.7 91.9 Intervention: received pedometers and health‐related coaching. 24 Without Yes
28 64 31.2 84.9 Control: only received health‐related coaching.
Kirk et al., 2009d 19 99 62.1 32.8 NA Intervention: received pedometers, physical activity consultation and telephone call. 48 Without NS
35 59.2 34.9 NA Control: received standard care and telephone call.
Plotnikoff et al., 2013d 20 139 61.8 30.2 NA Intervention: received pedometers, theory‐based behavioural interventions and physical activity education. 48 Without NS
83 61.0 30.2 NA Control: received standard physical activity education.
Tudor‐Locke et al., 2004 22 24 52.8 34.1 96.8 Intervention: received pedometers with instructions for goal‐setting and motivational postcards. 16 Without Yes
23 52.5 32.5 92.3 Control: only received motivational postcards for thanks.
Van Dyck et al., 2013c 23 60 62 30.2 89.2 Intervention: received pedometer‐based physical activity interventions with telephone support. 24 Without Yes
32 29.7 84.5 Control: received usual care.
a

Data for age, BMI, weight were imputed using baseline mean values.

b

Number of participants included in the per‐protocol or intention‐to‐treat analyses.

c

Reported follow‐up data of BMI and weight after the completion of pedometer interventions.

d

Included two intervention groups and both were combined into one group.

NS, not specified; NA, not applicable.