Table 1.
Source | Characteristics of participantsa | Intervention and control groups | Intervention details | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample sizeb | Age, year | BMI, kg/m2 | Weight, kg | Duration, weeks | Dietary advice | Step goal | ||
Andrews et al., 2011 12 | 246 | 60.0 | 31.6 | 91.1 | Intervention: received pedometer‐based walking interventions and dietary consultation with nurse support. | 48 | With | NS |
248 | 60.1 | 31.5 | 90.2 | Control: received dietary consultation with nurse support. | ||||
Araiza et al., 2006 13 | 15 | 49 | 30.0 | NA | Intervention: received pedometer‐based walking interventions. | 6 | Without | Yes |
15 | 51 | 33.5 | NA | Control: were asked to maintain normal activity habits. | ||||
Bjorgaas et al., 2008 14 | 23 | 56.4 | 31.2 | 94.8 | Intervention: received pedometers and were encouraged to increase daily time on walking. | 24 | Without | Yes |
25 | 61.2 | 31.5 | 95.2 | Control: were encouraged to increase daily time on walking. | ||||
De Greef et al., 2010c 15 | 20 | 61.3 | 29 | 83.5 | Intervention: received cognitive–behavioural pedometer‐based interventions. | 12 | Without | Yes |
21 | 61.3 | 31.5 | 92.6 | Control: received usual care. | ||||
De Greef et al., 2011d 16 | 43 | 68.3 | 29.7 | NA | Intervention: received pedometer‐based physical activity programmes with individual or group counselling. | 12 | Without | Yes |
24 | 66.0 | 31.5 | NA | Control: received general care. | ||||
Diedrich et al., 2010 17 | 16 | 56.7 | NA | 94.8 | Intervention: received pedometer‐based programmes, books (Manpo‐kei) and usual diabetes education. | 12 | With | NS |
17 | 54.9 | NA | 107.1 | Control: received usual diabetes education. | ||||
Engel and Linder 2006 18 | 22 | 60.5 | 32.7 | 91.9 | Intervention: received pedometers and health‐related coaching. | 24 | Without | Yes |
28 | 64 | 31.2 | 84.9 | Control: only received health‐related coaching. | ||||
Kirk et al., 2009d 19 | 99 | 62.1 | 32.8 | NA | Intervention: received pedometers, physical activity consultation and telephone call. | 48 | Without | NS |
35 | 59.2 | 34.9 | NA | Control: received standard care and telephone call. | ||||
Plotnikoff et al., 2013d 20 | 139 | 61.8 | 30.2 | NA | Intervention: received pedometers, theory‐based behavioural interventions and physical activity education. | 48 | Without | NS |
83 | 61.0 | 30.2 | NA | Control: received standard physical activity education. | ||||
Tudor‐Locke et al., 2004 22 | 24 | 52.8 | 34.1 | 96.8 | Intervention: received pedometers with instructions for goal‐setting and motivational postcards. | 16 | Without | Yes |
23 | 52.5 | 32.5 | 92.3 | Control: only received motivational postcards for thanks. | ||||
Van Dyck et al., 2013c 23 | 60 | 62 | 30.2 | 89.2 | Intervention: received pedometer‐based physical activity interventions with telephone support. | 24 | Without | Yes |
32 | 29.7 | 84.5 | Control: received usual care. |
Data for age, BMI, weight were imputed using baseline mean values.
Number of participants included in the per‐protocol or intention‐to‐treat analyses.
Reported follow‐up data of BMI and weight after the completion of pedometer interventions.
Included two intervention groups and both were combined into one group.
NS, not specified; NA, not applicable.