Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 1;9(6):772–781. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12375

Table 2.

MLVA types

MLVA VNTR‐code ERIC genotype Prevalence (%)
1 2‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 1.0
2 4‐6‐3‐3‐1 I 30.1
3 4‐6‐3‐3‐3 I 1.0
4 4‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 1.4
5 5‐6‐3‐3‐1 I 1.0
6 5‐6‐3‐3‐3 I 3.8
7 5‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 4.3
8 5‐6‐4‐3‐6 I 1.0
9 6‐6‐3‐3‐2 I 2.3
10 6‐6‐4‐3‐2 I 11.0
11 6‐6‐4‐3‐3 I 1.4
12 6‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 1.9
13 7‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 17.7
14 10‐6‐4‐3‐4 I 3.8
15 10‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 4.8
16 13‐6‐4‐3‐4 I 0.5
17 13‐6‐4‐3‐5 I 3.3
18 4‐0‐3‐7‐5 II 0.5
19 6‐0‐3‐7‐5 II 1.0
20 7‐0‐3‐7‐5 II 6.2
21 8‐0‐3‐7‐5 II 0.5
22 2‐6‐5‐11‐0 III 0.5
23 2‐0‐5‐11‐0 IV 0.5

Of each MLVA type the VNTR‐code, ERIC genotype and prevalence in our dataset is given. Seventeen MLVA types belonged to ERIC type I strains, four belong to ERIC type II. ERIC type III and IV were represented by only one MLVA type. Most MLVA types show a very low prevalence, only three types have a prevalence higher than 10%.