Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 20;16:595. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1856-x

Table 3.

Results from sensitivity analyses which restricted the control group to MOH health centres offering free services through study period and geographically separated from CHAM user fee introducing/removing centres

Total outpatient attendances Total new malaria diagnoses, under 5 s Total new malaria diagnoses, over 5 s New confirmed HIV+ patient, aged 15–49
Periods 1 and 2: Introduction of user feesa
 Estimated change (%) −70 −22 −56 −52
 95 % confidence interval [−92, 8] [−78, 177] [−86, 40] [−77, 1]
P-value 0 · 060 0 · 66 0 · 14 0 · 051
 Number of centres 8 8 8 8
 Number of months 35 35 35 35
Periods 2 and 3: Removal of user feesb
 Estimated change (%) 345 170 261 -c
 95 % confidence interval [136, 737] [13, 545] [130, 467] -
P-value 0 · 001 0 · 031 <0 · 001 -
 Number of centres 8 8 8 8
 Number of months 27 27 27 27

The estimated change represents the average difference in monthly attendances or diagnoses associated with the introduction or removal of user fees. Standard errors were clustered at the health centre level

aEstimated using data from the period July 2012 to June 2015

bEstimated using data from the period August 2013 to October 2015

cThere were two few new confirmed HIV+ patients treated at the centre which removed user fees to analyse