Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 20;12(10):e1005954. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005954

Table 1. Transthoracic echocardiography in T. cruzi-infected (± resveratrol or SRT1720 treatment) mice.

Parameters Mode WT WT x T. cruzi a Resveratrol x b SRT1720 x
T. cruzi
T. cruzi
Heart rate (HR, beats per minute) B mode 472 ± 51 464 ± 44 523± 63 489± 30
End systolic volume (ESV, μl) B mode 16.56± 3.93 37.16± 2.82*** 24.14± 2.95### 24.07± 0.83###
End diastolic volume (EDV, μl) B mode 55.22± 7.72 51.42± 6.88 53.82± 7.26 58.65± 2.94
Stroke volume (SV = EDV–ESV, μl) M mode 47.96± 2.08 29.60± 3.72*** 39.88± 4.29# 38.11± 3.47#
Cardiac output (HR x SV, ml/min) M mode 17.25± 2.76 8.52± 2.75*** 15.60± 3.83# 12.66± 0.41#
% Ejection fraction (% EF = EDV-ESV x 100 / EDV) M mode 65.78± 6.31 41.50± 5.60*** 49.90± 8.47 55.48± 4.46#
LVID, end systole (LVIDs, mm) M mode 1.48± 0.21 3.16 ± 0.21*** 3.18± 0.62 2.55± 0.66
% Fractional shortening (% FS = (LVIDd−LVIDs) x 100 / LVIDd M mode 34.95± 5.24 22.44± 1.46*** 21.41± 3.29 24.13 ± 2.67#
Interventricular septum (IVSs, mm) M mode 0.84 ± 0.23 1.21 ± 0.22* 0.82 ± 0.16 1.25 ± 0.21
IVSd, mm M mode 0.62± 0.14 1.04±0.20*** 0.89± 0.13 0.79±0.19
LV posterior wall (LVPWs, mm) M mode 1.45±0.30 0.85± 0.14*** 0.97± 0.22 1.18± 0.21
LVPWd, mm M mode 0.92± 0.17 0.67± 0.13* 0.86± 0.09 0.78± 0.23
IVSs / LVPWs ratio M mode 0.59± 0.15 1.4± 0.37*** 1.21± 0.25 0.94± 0.14
Area systole (mm2) B mode 11.29± 2.67 15.77± 3.29* 10.48± 1.07 10.38± 0.67#
Area diastole (mm2) B mode 17.67± 2.72 24.07±5.88* 16.36± 0.89 17.02± 1.46
LV mass (mg) M mode 69.91± 10.44 97.86± 11.54*** 73.53± 4.35 91.66± 3.04

C57BL/6 mice were infected with T. cruzi (10,000 parasites per mouse).

a Mice were treated with resveratrol (20 mg/L) in drinking water during days 90-111post-infection (pi).

b Mice were treated with SRT1720 (1 mg/mouse, intraperitoneal) during days 45–66 pi. Treatment was given three times a week.

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in B and M mode at ~150 days post-infection using a Vevo 2100 System.

Data are presented as mean value ± SD. Significance is plotted as *normal vs. infected and #WT.Tc vs. WT.Tc + treatment, and presented as *,# <0.05, **,## p<0.01, ***,### p<0.001 (n = 6–10 per group per experiment).