Abstract
In humans, phyllodes tumors of the breast are rare fibroepithelial tumors that are further characterized as benign, borderline, or malignant according to their histomorphologic features. Phyllodes tumors are poorly responsive to treatment other than excision. NHP have a much lower frequency of mammary neoplasia than do humans, and none of the lesions reported previously in NHP are consistent with phyllodes tumors. Here we present the case of a mammary tumor in a northern greater galago (Otolemur garnettii) that was histologically characteristic of a malignant phyllodes tumor. An 11-y-old, multiparous, pregnant galago presented with a mass in the right middle mammary gland. A fine-needle aspirate yielded neoplastic epithelial cells. Because the animal was pregnant and showed no signs of skin ulceration, pain, or distress, she was allowed to deliver and nurse the infant. At 20 wk after initial presentation, the infant was weaned and the mother was euthanized. At necropsy, the mammary mass measured 3.5 × 2.5 × 1.5 cm, a 13-fold increase in volume since initial presentation. There was no evidence of metastasis in draining lymph nodes, lungs, or any other tissue examined. The tumor was composed of neoplastic stromal, glandular, and adipose tissues and was diagnosed as a malignant phyllodes tumor in light of its high stromal cellularity, high mitotic rate, and marked atypia. This tumor also exhibited liposarcomatous differentiation, which occurs frequently in malignant phyllodes tumors. To our knowledge, this report represents the first described case involving an NHP of a mammary tumor with characteristics consistent with human phyllodes tumors.
Abbreviations: α-SMA; α-smooth muscle actin; FNA, fine-needle aspirate
Phyllodes tumors of the breast in humans are characterized by neoplastic proliferation of both stromal and glandular tissue components and have a propensity for rapid growth.22,26 Comprising less than 1% of all breast tumors and only 2% to 3% of mammary fibroepithelial neoplasms,10,31,33 phyllodes tumors are rare biphasic neoplasms of epithelium and expanded stroma and typically are characterized by leaf-like fronds residing in clefts.6,26,34 Phyllodes tumors are classified as benign, borderline, or malignant according to their histomorphologic features, including stromal cellularity, degree of atypia, mitotic activity, presence or absence of stromal overgrowth, and infiltration of surrounding breast tissue.22,26,31 Although recurrence of phyllodes tumors is common after local excision, phyllodes tumors metastasize infrequently even when histologically classified as malignant.8,36 However, malignant phyllodes tumors have a poor prognosis.36,37 Phyllodes tumors are insensitive to chemotherapy and radiation and behave more like pure sarcomas than like mammary carcinomas.13,15,31,36 In contrast, whereas human fibroadenomas likewise have epithelial and stromal components, they lack the atypia, stromal cellularity, and propensity for local recurrence seen with phyllodes tumors.34,39
From a comparative medicine perspective, NHP have a much lower frequency of naturally occurring mammary neoplasms than do humans.9,14,44 Mammary neoplasms are more frequently reported in Old World than New World primates, with the majority of reported mammary neoplasms described in rhesus macaques.9,12,14,17,25,44,45 The only reported case of a mammary tumor in a New World primate involved an adenocarcinoma in a male squirrel monkey.25,43 To our knowledge, phyllodes tumors have not been reported in either Old or New World primates.9,12,14,17,25,44,45 Within prosimians, 2 cases of mammary tumors in the brown greater galago (Otolemur crassicaudatus) were published more than 40 y ago.4,5,21,32 These 2 mammary tumor cases were described as a spindle-cell sarcoma and a mixed mammary tumor.5,21 Here we present a case of a mammary tumor in a northern greater galago (Otolemur garnettii) that was histologically characteristic of a malignant phyllodes tumor and contained neoplastic stromal, glandular, and adipose components.
Case Report
History.
An 11-y-old, multiparous, pregnant galago (Otolemur garnettii) in an established breeding colony presented during midterm gestation with an alopecic, semimovable, firm, multilobulated subcutaneous mass (1 × 1 × 0.5 cm) of the right middle mammary gland. A fine-needle aspirate (FNA) showed sheets of densely packed epithelial cells with anisokaryosis, anisocytosis, and an increased nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, consistent with a neoplasia of epithelial origin. Individual cells contained abundant cytoplasm, stippled chromatin, and multiple nucleoli. Because the animal was pregnant and had no signs of skin ulceration, pain, or distress, she was allowed to deliver and nurse the infant while being closely monitored. Both mother and infant remained in good body condition throughout the monitoring period. Given that galagos have 3 pairs of mammary glands, any decline in milk production from the affected gland appeared to be well compensated. At 20 wk after initial presentation, the infant was weaned and the mother euthanized and presented for necropsy.
On gross exam (Figure 1), the mammary mass measured 3.5 × 2.5 × 1.5 cm, a 13-fold increase in volume since initial presentation. On cut surface, the otherwise solid-appearing mass contained a cavity (1 × 0.7 cm) filled with milky fluid. Histologically, the cavity was consistent with the site of the prior FNA and was characterized by mild histiocytic inflammation, hemosiderin, and serous fluid.
Material and Methods
All animals involved were managed according to a breeding protocol approved by the Vanderbilt University IACUC and were housed in an AAALAC-accredited facility in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,18 the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,29 and the Animal Welfare Act.3 Galagos were maintained on a 12:12-h reversed light cycle using red-light filters during the day, received a commercial feline laboratory diet (LabDiet 5003, PMI Nutrition International, Brentwood MO) supplemented with sweet potatoes and a foraging mix (nuts, grain mixes), and had unrestricted access to water. The galago enrichment plan included social, structural, and sensory items. Social housing was provided for compatible breeding pairs and juveniles. Elevated perches (swinging or stationary), nest boxes, or hide tubes comprised structural enrichment. Sensory enrichment routinely included auditory (music, nature sounds) and olfactory (spices, scents) elements.
Tissues were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 µm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Additional sections were labeled with cytokeratin (dilution, 1:1000) and vimentin (1:500; dual stain, catalog no. Z0622, Cytokeratin Wide-Spectrum Screening and Vimentin, Dako, Carpinteria, CA), cytokeratin only (dilution, 1:4000; Dako), p63 (dilution, 1:500; catalog no. P3737, Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; dilution, 1:500; reference no. 0909, Dako) on the Bond-Max Immunostainer (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Results
The adjacent normal mammary tissue was compressed by an expansile, nonencapsulated, well-demarcated, nodular mass that extended subcutaneously to the underlying pectoral musculature. The mass consisted of malignant stromal, glandular, and adipose components, with complex morphology and multiple cysts (Figure 2 A). The stromal component was composed of densely cellular streams and whorls of markedly atypical spindle cells with a high mitotic rate of 24 per 10 high-power fields (Figure 2 B). In addition, the tumor contained an adenocarcinomatous component, composed of malignant glandular structures, moderately pleomorphic nuclei with multiple nucleoli, and an intermediate mitotic rate (7 per 10 high-power fields; Figure 2 C). The tumor also demonstrated heterologous differentiation, as indicated by the presence of a well-differentiated liposarcomal component with numerous lipoblasts (Figure 2 D). There was no gross or microscopic evidence of metastasis in draining lymph nodes, lungs, or other tissues. Unrelated to the mammary tumor, the capsular surface of both kidneys was irregular and pitted. Histologically, mild lymphohistiocytic interstitial nephritis with fibrosis was present. Renal tubules were dilated and often contained protein. Rare mineralization of tubular epithelial cells was noted, as well as occasional glomerulosclerosis (that is, increased glomerular mesangial matrix).
Cytokeratin Wide-Spectrum Screening.
The glandular epithelium demonstrated cytoplasmic cytokeratin staining, whereas the stroma was negative. Glandular epithelium consisted of both benign (Figure 3 A) and malignant components, with loss of myoepithelial cells around malignant, infiltrative-appearing glands (Figure 3 B).
Vimentin.
Intense cytoplasmic vimentin labeling was present in more than 80% of the stromal component of the tumor (Figure 3 A).
p63.
Intensely p63-positive myoepithelial cells had nuclear staining and formed a continuous layer surrounding the ducts and acini. Stromal tumor cells were negative for p63 (Figure 3 C).
α-SMA.
Intensely α-SMA-positive, basally located myoepithelial cells formed a continuous layer surrounding the normal ducts and acini. The malignant epithelial and stromal components were negative for α-SMA (Figure 3 D).
Discussion
Histologically, the mammary tumor in this galago had diagnostic features of a malignant human phyllodes tumor, given the presence of both epithelial and stromal components in the lesion and the characteristics of the stromal component, specifically the high stromal cellularity, high mitotic rate, marked cytologic atypia, stromal overgrowth, and heterologous liposarcomatous differentiation.22,26,31 Phyllodes tumors of the breast in humans are defined as mixed epithelial and stromal or mesenchymal neoplasms and are further characterized as benign, borderline or malignant according to their histomorphologic features, including stromal cellularity, degree of atypia, mitotic activity, presence or absence of stromal overgrowth (low-power microscopic fields without epithelium), and infiltration of surrounding breast tissue.6,26,34 These tumors often display a ‘leaf-like’ architecture, but some are solid and vaguely lobulated, as in the current case.33,38 Differential diagnoses for a phyllodes tumor include fibroadenoma, metaplastic carcinoma, and pure sarcoma. In humans, fibroadenomas are a much more common fibroepithelial mammary lesion than are phyllodes tumors, and fibroadenomas lack atypia, stromal overgrowth, significant mitotic activity, and increased stromal cellularity.39 In contrast, the tumor here had a highly cellular, sarcomatous stroma consistent with a malignant phyllodes tumor. Also unusual to our case is the presence of both benign and malignant epithelial components, a rare but described finding.27,30 Although fibroadenomas have been reported in macaques,14,44 to our knowledge the current report represents the first described case of a mammary tumor in an NHP that is consistent with human phyllodes tumors. The results of the immunohistochemistry we used here—cytokeratin wide-spectrum screening, vimentin, p63, and α-SMA—were consistent with a phyllodes tumor. Metaplastic carcinoma, a potential differential diagnosis due to the incidence of reported carcinomatous mammary lesions in macaques,14,25,44 was ruled out by the negative staining of the stromal component for p63 and wide-spectrum cytokeratin.1 In addition to having epithelial and fibrosarcomatous components consistent with those of human phyllodes tumors,22,26 this tumor exhibited liposarcomatous differentiation, which is a common heterologous element in malignant phyllodes tumors.16,19,24,28,35,41,42
The clinical presentation, disease progression, and age at presentation in this case were consistent with a human phyllodes tumor. Phyllodes tumors have been reported in pregnant women but are rare and frequently malignant,2,7,11,23 as was the tumor we report here. The affected galago was at midterm gestation when the tumor was first detected as a less than 1-cm3 mass; within 20 wk, the mass grew 13-fold to encompass considerably more volume than a normal galago mammary gland. Likewise, in humans, phyllodes tumors during pregnancy present most frequently during the third trimester as large, rapidly growing masses.11 Finally, although still producing offspring, the affected galago had reached an age typical for retirement from the breeding colony (10 to 15 y), whereas most humans at presentation for phyllodes tumors are premenopausal.11,40 Female galagos have estrus cycles and therefore do not undergo menopause, but the age at presentation is comparable between our galago and humans with phyllodes tumors.
It is unsurprising that FNA failed to support the diagnosis of a phyllodes tumor in our galago. The only cells recognized on FNA suggested neoplastic epithelial cells consistent with a carcinoma. Diagnosing phyllodes tumors on the basis of results of FNA is known to be challenging,15,20 because these lesions are heterogeneous and the tumor architecture may not be appreciated on FNA. In addition, phyllodes tumors are very rare in humans and have not previously been reported in NHP. In the absence of prior experience in diagnosing phyllodes tumors and of known tissue architecture, our FNA was interpreted to indicate a neoplasm of epithelial origin only. Retrospectively, we noted that the FNA also contained cells consistent with the neoplastic stromal component. Given the advanced age of the affected galago, case management would likely have been the same even had a phyllodes tumor been diagnosed according to the FNA results.
As previously mentioned, 2 cases of mammary tumors in the brown greater galago (Otolemur crassicaudatus) were reported more than 40 y ago.5 The histologic appearance of phyllodes tumors can vary widely, so although it is unclear whether these cases have more than superficial similarities to phyllodes tumors, the cell types described previously (spindle-cell sarcoma and benign mixed mammary tumor)5 might represent a histopathogenesis similar to that we reported here.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mary Feurtado for her technical assistance, Dr Vivien Casagrande for her cooperation in the clinical case management of this galago, Cindy Lowe (Translational Pathology Shared Resource) for performing immunohistochemistry, and Dr Justin Cates for reviewing liposarcomatous pathology.
References
- 1.Adem C, Reynolds C, Adlakha H, Roche PC, Nascimento AG. 2002. Wide-spectrum screening keratin as a marker of metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast: an immunohistochemical study of 24 patients. Histopathology 40:556–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andreola J, Damin A, Andreola J, Cruz J, Varella M, Canal L, Antunes P, Lomando G, Rauber A, Ponso A. 2012. Giant borderline phyllodes breast tumor in pregnancy. Journal of the senologic international society 1:3 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 2005. Animal Welfare Act and Animal Welfare Regulations. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Appleby EC. 1969. Tumours in captive wild animals: some observations and comparisons. Acta Zool Pathol Antverp 48:77–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Appleby EC, Keymer IF, Hime JM. 1974. Three cases of suspected mammary neoplasia in nonhuman primates. J Comp Pathol 84:351–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aranda FI, Laforga JB, López JI. 1994. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: an immunohistochemical study of 28 cases with special attention to the role of myofibroblasts. Pathol Res Pract 190:474–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bal A, Gungor B, Polat AK, Simsek T. 2012. Recurrent phyllodes tumor of the breast with malignant transformation during pregnancy. The journal of breast health 8:45–47. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barth RJ., Jr 1999. Histologic features predict local recurrence after breast conserving therapy of phyllodes tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 57:291–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Beck AP, Brooks A, Zeiss CJ. 2014. Invasive ductular carcinoma in 2 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Comp Med 64:314–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ben hassouna J, Damak T, Gamoudi A, Chargui R, Khomsi F, Mahjoub S, Slimene M, Ben Dhiab T, Hechiche M, Boussen H, Rahal K. 2006. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a case series of 106 patients. Am J Surg 192:141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blaker KM, Sahoo S, Schweichler MR, Chagpar AB. 2010. Malignant phylloides tumor in pregnancy. Am Surg 76:302–305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cohen M, Saidla JE, Schlafer DH. 2001. A spontaneously occurring mammary gland ductal carcinoma in situ in a rhesus macague (Macaca mulatta) and a review of spontaneous mammary gland tumors in rhesus monkeys. J Med Primatol 30:121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Confavreux C, Lurkin A, Mitton N, Blondet R, Saba C, Ranchere D, Sunyach MP, Thiesse P, Biron P, Blay JY, Ray-Coquard I. 2006. Sarcomas and malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast—a retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 42:2715–2721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cooper TK, Gabrielson KL. 2007. Spontaneous lesions in the reproductive tract and mammary gland of female nonhuman primates. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 80:149–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deen SA, McKee GT, Kissin MW. 1999. Differential cytologic features of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 20:53–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fletcher CDM. 2013. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th ed. Lyon (France): IARC Press. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hubbard GB, Wood DH, Butcher WI. 1984. Mammary carcinoma with metastasis in a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Vet Pathol 21:531–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
- 19.Isotalo PA, George RL, Walker R, Sengupta SK. 2005. Malignant phyllodes tumor with liposarcomatous differentiation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:421–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jacklin RK, Ridgway PF, Ziprin P, Healy V, Hadjiminas D, Darzi A. 2006. Optimising preoperative diagnosis in phyllodes tumour of the breast. J Clin Pathol 59:454–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kohn DF, Haines DE. 1982. The lesser bushbaby (galago) as an animal model: selected topics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
- 22.Lakhani SR, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. 2012. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast, no. 4. Lyon (France): IARC.
- 23.Likhitmaskul T, Asanprakit W, Charoenthammaraksa S, Lohsiriwat V, Supaporn S, Vassanasiri W, Sattaporn S. 2015. Giant benign phyllodes tumor with lactating changes in pregnancy: a case report. Gland Surg 4:339–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lyle PL, Bridge JA, Simpson JF, Cates JM, Sanders ME. 2016. Liposarcomatous differentiation in malignant phyllodes tumors is unassociated with MDM2 or CDK4 amplification. Histopathology 68:1040–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miller AD. 2012. Nonhuman primates in biomedical research, 2nd ed. New York (NY): Elsevier Inc.
- 26.Moffat CJ, Pinder SE, Dixon AR, Elston CW, Blamey RW, Ellis IO. 1995. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a clinicopathological review of 32 cases. Histopathology 27:205–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parfitt JR, Armstrong C, O'Malley F, Ross J, Tuck AB. 2004. In situ and invasive carcinoma within a phyllodes tumor associated with lymph node metastases. World J Surg Oncol 2:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Powell CM, Rosen PP. 1994. Adipose differentiation in cystosarcoma phyllodes. A study of 14 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 18:720–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Public Health Service. 2002. Policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services.
- 30.Quinlan-Davidson S, Hodgson N, Elavathil L, Shangguo T. 2011. Borderline phyllodes tumor with an incidental invasive tubular carcinoma and lobular carcinoma in situ component: a case report. J Breast Cancer 14:237–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reinfuss M, Mitus J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Rys J, Smolak K. 1996. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer 77:910–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Remick AK, Van Wettere AJ, Williams CV. 2009. Neoplasia in prosimians: case series from a captive prosimian population and literature review. Vet Pathol 46:746–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rosen PP, Oberman HA. 1993. Tumors of the mammary gland. In: Rosai J, Carcangiu ML, DeLelli RA. Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd in series. Washington (DC): Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
- 34.Sanders LM, Daigle ME, Tortora M, Panasiti R. 2015. Transformation of benign fibroadenoma to malignant phyllodes tumor. Acta Radiol Open 4:2058460115592061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Satou T, Matsunami N, Fujiki C, Tanaka K, Hayashi Y, Hashimoto S. 2000. Malignant phyllodes tumor with liposarcomatous components: a case report with cytological presentation. Diagn Cytopathol 22:364–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Singer A, Tresley J, Velazquez-Vega J, Yepes M. 2013. Unusual aggressive breast cancer: metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor. J Radiol Case Rep 7:24–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Suzuki-Uematsu S, Shiraishi K, Ito T, Adachi N, Inage Y, Taeda Y, Ueki H, Ohtani H. 2009. Malignant phyllodes tumor composed almost exclusively of a fibrosarcomatous component: a case report and review of malignant phyllodes tumors with metastases. Breast Cancer 17:218–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, Badve S, Bleiweiss IJ, Brogi E, Calvo JP, Dabbs DJ, Ellis IO, Eusebi V, Farshid G, Fox SB, Ichihara S, Lakhani SR, Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Richardson AL, Sahin A, Schmitt FC, Schnitt SJ, Siziopikou KP, Soares FA, Tse GM, Vincent-Salomon A, Tan PH. 2015. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology 68:5–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tan PH, Ellis IO. 2013. Myoepithelial and epithelial–myoepithelial, mesenchymal, and fibroepithelial breast lesions: updates from the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 2012. J Clin Pathol 66:465–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, Thu MM, Busmanis I, Li H, Chay WY, Tan MH, Phyllodes Tumour Network Singapore. 2011. Predicting clinical behaviour of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol 65:69–76. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Tomas D, Bujas T, Stajduhar E, Kirac P, Mijic A, Kruslin B. 2007. Malignant phyllodes tumor with associated osteosarcomatous, chondrosarcomatous, and liposarcomatous overgrowth. APMIS 115:367–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Uriev L, Maslovsky I, Vainshtein P, Yoffe B, Ben-Dor D. 2006. Malignant phyllodes tumor with heterologous liposarcomatous differentiation and tubular adenoma-like epithelial component. Int J Med Sci 3:130–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Waggie KS, Tolwani RJ, Lyons DM. 2000. Mammary adenocarcinoma in a male squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Vet Pathol 37:505–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wood CE, Usborne AL, Starost MF, Tarara RP, Hill LR, Wilkinson LM, Geisinger KR, Feiste EA, Cline JM. 2006. Hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions of the mammary gland in macaques. Vet Pathol 43:471–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang X, Hori T, Fukuda A, Kamimura Y, Hirakawa K, Maeda H, Miyajima H. 2003. Malignant myoepithelioma with a squamous epithelial component in the mammary gland of a cynomolgus monkey. Toxicol Pathol 31:549–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]