Table 2.
Acute/active ABMR | |
1 | Evidence of acute tissue injury, including one or more of the following |
Microvascular inflammation (g > 0 and/or ptc > 0) | |
Intimal or transmural arteritis (v > 0) | |
Acute thrombotic microangiopathy, in the absence of any other cause | |
Acute tubular injury, in the absence of any other cause | |
2 | Evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, including at least one of the following: |
Linear C4d staining in ptc | |
Moderate microvascular inflammation(g + ptc ≧ 2) | |
Increased expression of gene transcripts indicative of endothelial injury | |
3 | Serologic evidence of DSAs |
Chronic/active ABMR | |
1 | Evidence of chronic tissue injury, including one or more of the following |
Transplant glomerulopathy(cg > 0) | |
Severe ptc basement membrane multilayering (requires EM) | |
Arterial intimal fibrosis of new onset, excluding other causes | |
2 | Evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, including at least one of the following |
Linear C4d staining in ptc | |
moderate microvascular inflammation(g + ptc ≧ 2) | |
Increased expression of gene transcripts indicative of endothelial injury | |
3 | Serologic evidence of DSAs |
The bold font showed the most important factor to diagnose ABMR (Acute and Chronic).
DSAs, donor-specific HLA antibodies; EM, electron microscopy.
Furthermore, in the revised criteria, ABMR phenotypes have been classified as acute/active; chronic/active corresponding to the diagnostic criteria, which have been listed in detail.