Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0106-1

Table 4.

Antimicrobial resistance profiles of the 53 Enterobacteriaceae bacterial species

Antimicrobial agent Bacterial resistant patterns
E.coli (19) Klebsiella spp (10) Citrobacter spp (9) Unidentified (7) *Others (8)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
AMP 19 (100.0) 10 (100.0) 9 (100) 7 (100) 8 (100.0)
C 1 (5.3) 1 (20.0) 2 (22) 2 (29) 3 (37.5)
AMC 18 (94.7) 9 (90.0) 8 (88.9) 5 (71.4) 8 (100.0)
CTR 7 (36.8) 4 (40.0) 4 (44.4) 4 (57.1) 5 (55.6)
CAZ 10 (52.6) 4 (40.0) 4 (44.4) 5 (71.4) 3 (55.6)
CO 12 (63.2) 9 (90.0) 8 (89) 5 (71.0) 7 (87.5)
GE 1 (5.3) 3 (30.0) 0 (0) 3 (43.0) 1 (25.0)
CIP 3 (15.8) 1 (10.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
MEM 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

AMP ampicillin, C chloramphenicol, AMC amoxycillin-clavulanate, CTR ceftriaxone, CAZ ceftazidime, CO trimethoprim – sulfamethoxazole, GE gentamicin, CIP ciprofloxacin, MEM meropenem, n number of resistant bacterial species.

*Others: Enterobacter spp (3), Salmonella spp (2), Serratia marcescens (1), Morganella morganii (1), and Proteus vulgaris (1)