Table 1.
Compliance | Number of inspections | Number of premises | Premises-level prevalence (95 % CIs) |
---|---|---|---|
Compliant | 10071 | 6937 | – |
Non-compliant, overweight | 74 | 63 | 0.80 (0.62–1.02) |
Non-compliant, underweight | 1227 | 861 | 10.96 (10.27–11.67) |
Non-compliant, CP-8 | 1326 | 933 | 11.86 (11.15–12.59) |
Total inspections | 11397 | 7870 | – |
Percentage of inspections and premises non-compliant with checkpoint 8, where the inspector reported at least one horse as over- or underweight
Nine inspections had both under and overweight horses recorded; 1726 (13.0 %) visits did not inspect horses and 133 (1.0 %) visits were not applicable for checkpoint 8. Reasons for non-compliance were missing for 34 inspections and 11 premises, thus these have been excluded from the total denominator in calculations of prevalence for reasons of being under or overweight