Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 30;94:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.03.018

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison between observed and predicted CLR by the mechanistic tubular reabsorption model. Symbols indicate neutral (Image 11), basic (Image 12), acidic (Image 13), zwitterion (Image 14) and amphoteric (Image 15) drugs respectively. Solid and dashed lines represent line of unity and 3-fold error, respectively. The inset shows the data for lower CLR values for clarity.