Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;37(17):1589–1600. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24375

Table 2.

Overlap measures for the eight perturbations of NOA and OA, performed at the MM level, based on 60,000 (NOA) or 4000 (OA) snapshots. Each measure is the minimum (Ω, K AB, and Π) or maximum (w max, ΔΔG EA, and ΔΔG TI) value over the 26 λ values for the simulations with and without the host.

Ω K AB Π w max ΔΔG EA ΔΔG TI
NOA
MeBz→Bz 1.00 1.03 2.9 0.003 0.02 0.04
EtBz→MeBz 1.00 1.04 2.7 0.004 0.03 0.03
pClBz→Bz 1.00 1.03 2.9 0.002 0.02 0.04
mClBz→Bz 1.00 1.03 2.8 0.002 0.06 0.02
Hx→Bz 1.00 1.03 2.5 0.004 0.06 0.02
MeHx→Hx 1.00 1.03 2.8 0.017 0.05 0.01
Hx→Pen 1.00 1.04 2.5 0.026 0.08 0.04
Hep→Hx 1.00 1.04 2.5 0.009 0.05 0.06
OA
MeBz→Bz 0.99 1.01 2.3 0.010 0.20 0.13
EtBz→MeBz 1.00 1.02 2.1 0.024 0.23 0.03
pClBz→Bz 1.00 1.02 2.5 0.009 0.12 0.14
mClBz→Bz 0.99 1.02 2.2 0.019 0.24 0.02
Hx→Bz 0.99 1.00 1.2 0.106 0.94 0.21
MeHx→Hx 0.93 0.79 1.1 0.947 16.19 0.34
Hx→Pen 0.95 0.85 0.0 0.716 1.69 0.06
Hep→Hx 0.98 0.93 −0.1 0.377 6.42 0.03

The measures are the Bhattacharyya coefficient for the energy distribution overlap (Ω),73 the Wu & Kofke overlap measures of the energy probability distributions (K AB) and their bias metrics (Π)74, 75 the weight of the maximum term in the EA (w max),20 the difference of the forward and backward EA estimate (ΔΔG EA in kJ/mol), and the difference between the BAR and TI estimates (ΔΔG TI in kJ/mol). Values indicating poor overlap or bad convergence are marked in bold face (Ω < 0.7, K AB < 0.7, Π < 0.5, w max > 0.2, ΔΔG EA > 4 kJ/mol, or ΔΔG TI > 1 kJ/mol).72, 74, 75