Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;3(8):1600097. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600097

Table 1.

Performance of milliliter‐scale MFCs with carbon‐based bioanodes

Bio‐anode material Open‐circuit potential [V] Bacteria Maximum volumetric power densitya) [W m−3] Maximum volumetric power densityb) [W m−3] Refs.
Plain graphite Anaerobically activated sludge 0.4 (45 mL) 32
Carbon felt ≈0.56 Mixed bacteria 0.8 (36 mL) 10.1 (2.8 mL) 33
Polyaniline‐coated carbon felt ≈0.60 Mixed bacteria 1.1 (36 mL) 13.7 (2.8 mL) 33
Polyaniline/poly(1,8‐diaminonaphthalene)‐coated carbon felt ≈0.50 Mixed bacteria 93.3 (36 mL) 933 (3.6 mL) 34
Carbon cloth ≈0.70 Mixed bacteria 60.0 (28 mL) 35
Polyaniline/TiO2‐coated Ni foam 0.88 E. coli 135 (25 mL) 36
3D graphene scaffold ≈0.68 S. oneidensis 27 (25 mL) 661 (1.02 mL) 12
Carbon felt 0.17 Anaerobically activated sludge 10.8 (20 mL) 37
Carbon nanotube sponge 0.25 Anaerobically activated sludge 14.1 (20 mL) 940 (0.3 mL) 37
CC 0.58 ± 0.02 S. oneidensis 17 ± 1 (25 mL) 56 ± 2 (7.5 mL) This Work
rGO‐Ni 0.60 ± 0.01 S. oneidensis 83 ± 2 (25 mL) 276 ± 4 (7.5 mL) This Work
N‐GA 0.69 ± 0.01 S. oneidensis 225 ± 12 (25 mL) 750 ± 40 (7.5 mL) This Work

a)Normalized to the total volume of the anodic chamber (listed in the parenthesis);

b)Normalized to the total volume of bioanode (listed in the parenthesis).