Table A1.
Goodness‐of‐Fit (BIC) of Two Different Probabilistic Models (1PL vs. 2PL for the Achievement Measures in the Present Study)
| Construct | Model | BIC | AIC | cAIC |
| Ck | 1PL | 30,212.62 | 29,507.22 | 30,330.62 |
| 2PL | 30,905.99 | 29,507.15 | 31,139.98 | |
| Si | 1PL | 43,139.02 | 42,214.19 | 43,293.03 |
| 2PL | 43,971.50 | 42,133.86 | 44,277.50 | |
| Vs | 1PL | 77,683.33 | 77,507.60 | 77.712,34 |
| 2PL | 77,033.14 | 76,693.79 | 77.089,13 | |
| Gca | 1PL | 96,540.95 | 96,353.10 | 96.000,53 |
| 2PL | 95,940.52 | 95,576.93 | 96.571,96 |
Note. BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, AIC = Akaike's Information Criterion, consistent Akaike's Information Criterion = cAIC, 1PL = one parameter logistic, 2PL = two parameter logistic, ck = content knowledge, si = scientific inquiry, vs = verbal skills, gca = general cognitive abilities.