Table 2.
Details of all three Fragaria chiloensis crosses, including relative divergence of Z and W haplotypes in the sex‐determining region (SDR) vicinity
| Cross | Maternal parent | Paternal parent | Offspring number | SNPs in coupling, SDR vicinitya | SNPs in coupling, high‐W divergence windowb | SNPs in repulsion, SDR vicinityc | Paternally segregating, SDR vicinityd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM1 × SAL3 | HM1 (aka GP33e) | SAL3 | 1275 | 18 | 10 (two nonsynonymous, one synonymous, seven noncodingf) | 18 | 9, 15 |
| EUR13 × EUR3 | EUR13 | EUR3 | 20 | 2 | 1 (one noncodingf) | 2 | 0, 3 |
| PTR14 × PTR19 | PTR14 | PTR19 | 20 | 7 | 4 (two nonsynonymous, two noncodingf) | 5 | 0, 4 |
a
Number of maternal SNPs in coupling male sterility/female fertility (i.e. on W) in the SDR vicinity.
b
Number of maternal SNPs in coupling male sterility/female fertility within the high‐W divergence window.
c
Number of maternal SNPs in repulsion male sterility/female fertility (i.e. on Z) in the SDR vicinity.
d
Number of paternal SNPs segregating on each of two haplotypes (i.e. on either Z) in the SDR vicinity.
e
See the Materials and Methods section and Goldberg et al. (2010).
f
One noncoding ‘sex‐associated marker’ is shared among all three crosses.