Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 29;34(29):3518–3528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6693

Table 5.

Comparison of FISH Groups, FDA Guidelines Status, and ASCO-CAP Guidelines Status, and Associations With Outcomes in BCIRG Clinical Trials

FISH Group Frequency, %* FDA Status ASCO-CAP Guidelines HER2 Protein Expression Prognosis (BCIRG-005 trial) Response to HER2-Targeted Therapy (BCIRG-006) BCIRG/TRIO Study Conclusion
Ratio Average HER2 per Tumor Cell
≥ 2.0 ≥ 4.0 1 40.8 Amplified ISH positive HER2 overexpression (P < .0001; IHC3+) Not included in trial Significantly improved outcomes HER2 amplified
≥ 2.0 < 4.0 2 0.7 Amplified ISH positive HER2 low expression (P < .0001; IHC0/1+) Not included in trial No significant benefit HER2 not amplified
< 2.0 ≥ 6.0 3 0.5 Not amplified ISH positive Combination of HER2 low and overexpression Indeterminate mixed category Indeterminate, mixed category Mixed HER2 not amplified and amplified, on the basis of expression
< 2.0 ≥ 4.0, < 6.0 4 4.1 Not amplified ISH equivocal HER2 low expression (P < .0001; IHC0/1+) Not associated with worse outcomes Not included in trial HER2 not amplified
< 2.0 < 4.0 5 53.9 Not amplified ISH negative HER2 low expression (P < .0001; IHC0/1+) Not associated with worse outcomes Not included in trial HER2 not amplified

Abbreviations: BCIRG, Breast Cancer International Research Group; CAP, College of American Pathologists; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; TRIO, Translational Research in Oncology.

*

Frequencies are based on screened population in Table 1.

FDA HER2 status is based on the 1997 HER2 INFORM-HER assay approval27 (Ventana Medical Systems) and the 2002 FDA package insert related to the HER2 PathVysion FISH assay20 (Abbott Laboratories).