Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 29;34(29):3554–3561. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3434

Table 3.

Associations Between Informal Caregiver Self-Rated Health and Poor Perceived Quality of Care Among Patients With Lung and Colorectal Cancer (multivariable logistic regressions; Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study, 2003 to 2006; N = 689)

Variable Model*
1 2 3 4
Caregiver self-rated health
 Excellent/very good Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Good 1.50 (0.59 to 3.46) 1.25 (0.49 to 3.17) 2.24 (0.90 to 7.52) 1.46 (0.58 to 3.39)
 Fair/poor 3.76 (1.76 to 9.55) 2.85 (1.39 to 8.42) 3.10 (1.18 to 9.43) 3.54 (1.65 to 9.06)
Confounders
 Patient psychosocial factors (spillover)
  Follow-up
   Depressive symptoms 1.34 (1.07 to 1.59)
   Mental HRQoL 1.00 (0.96 to 1.05)
   Physical HRQoL 0.98 (0.96 to 1.03)
  Baseline
   Depressive symptoms 0.86 (0.68 to 1.01)
   Mental HRQoL 0.96 (0.90 to 0.98)
   Physical HRQoL 0.97 (0.92 to 1.00)
 Patient assessment of care
  Follow-up
   Communication 0.96 (0.94 to 0.97)
   Coordination 0.95 (0.95 to 0.96)
  Baseline
   Communication 1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)
   Coordination 1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)
 Caregiver medical and/or nursing tasks 1.11 (0.95 to 1.30)

NOTE. Data are presented as OR (95% CI). Fair/poor perceived quality of care, 1; good/very good/excellent perceived quality of care, 0.

Abbreviations: HRQoL, health-related quality of life; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference.

*

All models control for perceived quality of care at baseline, cancer type, stage at diagnosis, amount of caregiving provided by the caregiver, coresidence of the caregiver and survivor, caregiver income, and whether the survivor received surgery for his/her cancer.