Table 2. Mean age predictions of female and male wMel and wMelPop infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes using the cross validation method.

wMel infected Ae. aegypti: Cross Validation						wMelPop infected Ae. aegypti: Cross validation
	wMel infected females [N = 284]		wMel infected males [N = 277]			wMelPop infected females [N = 229]			wMelPop infected males [N = 234]
Actual age	Mean predicted age [95% CI]	SEM	Actual age	Mean predicted age [95% CI]	SEM	Actual age	Mean predicted age [95% CI]	SEM	Actual age	Mean predicted age [95% CI]	SEM
1	2.8a[1.6–3.9]	0.5	1	4.8a[3.9–5.6]	0.4	1	2.4a[1.4–3.9]	0.5	1	3.9a[2.9–5.0]	0.5
5	10.0b[9.2–10.7]	0.3	5	6.4ab[5.6–7.2]	0.3	5	9.0b[8.3–9.8]	0.3	5	8.9b[7.9–9.8]	0.4
10	13.2c[12.3–14.1]	0.4	10	7.6b[6.6–8.6]	0.4	10	9.7b[8.6–10.8]	0.5	10	11.0c[10.1–11.9]	0.4
15	13.6c[12.4–14.7]	0.5	15	15.8c[15.1–16.5]	0.3	15	12.6c[11.6–13.6]	0.4	15	12.2c[11.0–13.4]	0.5
19	14.6c,d[13.6–15.7]	0.5	19	16.7c[15.4–18.1]	0.6	19	16.4d[15.6–17.2]	0.4	19	14.3d[13.3–15.2]	0.4
20	15.8d[14.9–16.7]		20	16.7c[15.9–17.6]	0.4

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.05 when using Tukey post hoc test

Actual and mean predicted ages shown are in days

¹ The accuracy of samples used to develop calibration models