Table 5.
Structural and Functional ACC Connectivity in Adolescent Depression
Structural Connectivity | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Adolescents at High Risk for Depression | ||||||||
| ||||||||
HR n | LR n | Mean Age | FA Difference | Tract | T | b-value | Directions | |
|
||||||||
Huang 2011 | 18 | 13 | 15.6 | ↓ | Cingulum | 3 | 1000 | 30 |
Keedwell 2012 | 18 | 15 | 22.2 | ↓ | Cingulum | 3 | 1000 | 30 |
| ||||||||
Adolescents with Depression | ||||||||
| ||||||||
MD n | TD n | Mean Age | FA Difference | Tract | T | b-value | Directions | |
|
||||||||
Cullen 2010 | 14 | 14 | 16.8 | ↓ | Cingulum | 3 | 1000 | 30 |
Henderson 2013 | 17 | 16 | 16.6 | ↓ | Cingulum, ATR | 3 | 1000 | 12 |
LeWinn 2014 | 52 | 42 | 16.1 | ↓ | ATR | 3 | 1500 | 30 |
| ||||||||
Functional Connectivity | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Adolescents at High Risk for Depression | ||||||||
| ||||||||
HR n | LR n | Mean Age | ACC Connectivity | Regions with Connectivity to ACC | Subregion | Context | Method | |
|
||||||||
Chai 2015 | 27 | 16 | 11.2 | ↓ | dlPFC | sgACC | Rest | mPFC/PCC, dlPFF amygdala seeds |
| ||||||||
↑ | mPFC/PCC | |||||||
| ||||||||
Clasen 2014 | 11 | 13 | 13.6 | ↓ | rIFG | dACC | Rest | rIFG seed |
| ||||||||
Kerestes 2016 | 29 | 43 | 14 | - | - | - | Viewing happy faces | Putamen, dlPFC seeds |
| ||||||||
Adolescents with Depressive Symptoms | ||||||||
| ||||||||
n | Mean Age | ACC Connectivity | Regions with Connectivity to ACC | Subregion | Context | Method | ||
Strikwerda-Brown 2014 | 72 | 16.47 | ↓ | PCC, angular gyrus, dlPFC, dmPFC, vmPFC | sgACC | Rest | sgACC seed | |
| ||||||||
Davey 2015 | 56 | 16.5 | ↑ | Amygdala | sgACC | Rest | Amygdala seed | |
| ||||||||
Adolescents with Current Depression | ||||||||
| ||||||||
MD N | TD N | Mean Age | ACC Connectivity | Regions with Connectivity to ACC | Subregion | Context | Method | |
|
||||||||
Connolly 2013 | 23 | 36 | 16 | ↑ | Insula, amygdala | sgACC | Rest | 4 sgACC seeds |
| ||||||||
Cullen 2009 | 12 | 14 | 16.6 | ↓ | mPFC, STG, Insula | sgACC | Rest | sgACC, dACC, amygdala seeds |
| ||||||||
Gabbay 2013 | 21 | 21 | 16.7 | ↑ | Caudate | sgACC, pgACC | Rest | 6 striatal seeds |
| ||||||||
Geng 2016 | 26 | 31 | 15.6 | - | - | - | Rest | Hippocampus seed |
| ||||||||
Kim 2015 | 22 | 20 | 14 | - | - | - | Rest | Amygdala, PCC seeds |
| ||||||||
Pannekoek 2014 | 26 | 26 | 15 | ↑ | Amygala | pgACC dACC |
Rest | Amygdala, seeds dACC, PCC |
| ||||||||
↓ | mPFC | |||||||
| ||||||||
Blom 2012 | 31 | 36 | 16 | ↑ | Insula | dACC | Viewing affective faces | Insula seed |
| ||||||||
Ho 2014 | 19 | 19 | 16 | ↓ | mPFC, insula, fusiform, precuneus | sgACC | Viewing fearful faces | sgACC seed |
| ||||||||
↑ | Amygdala | |||||||
| ||||||||
Ho 2015 | 26 | 37 | 16 | ↑ | mPFC, PCC | dACC | Viewing affective faces | mPFC, PCC seeds |
| ||||||||
Kerestes 2016 | 29 | 43 | 15.3 | - | - | - | Viewing Happy Faces | Putamen, dlPFC seeds |
| ||||||||
Perlman 2012 | 14 | 14 | 15.4 | ↑ | Amygdala | sgACC | Emotion regulation task | Amygdala seed |
Note: Papers are listed by name of first author; et al. is implied. Upward arrow indicates greater value in clinical or high-risk group than in typically developing (TD) group. HR: high-risk; LR: low-risk; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: major depression; ATR: anterior thalamic radiations; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; dlPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; dmPFC: dorsomedial PFC; vmPFC: ventromedial PFC; sgACC: subgenual ACC; mPFC: medial PFC; STG: superior temporal gyrus; dACC: dorsal ACC; pgACC: pregenual ACC.