Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;33(10):725–736. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0405-y

Table 3.

Comparison of rivastigmine steady-state plasma concentrations by patch size stratified by baseline renal impairment

Patch size (cm2) Group n Median (ng/mL) Range (ng/mL) Arithmetic mean (ng/mL) Standard deviation (ng/mL) Geometric mean (ng/mL) Geometric mean 95 % CI Ratio (%) of geometric means (renal impairment: control)
Renal impairment measured by CLCR
 5 Control 9 2.2 1.4–14.0 3.9 4.0 2.9 1.8–4.7 93.8
 5 Renal impairment 10 2.7 0.6–7.2 3.5 2.3 2.7 1.7–4.5
 10 Control 100 5.0 0.5–26.9 6.6 5.1 5.0 4.3–5.8 122
 10 Renal impairment 72 5.9 0.7–41.0 8.8 7.8 6.1 5.0–7.5
 15 Control 6 8.6 1.3–21.6 10.3 7.9 7.2 3.1–16.6 121
 15 Renal impairment 12 9.5 2.9–36.6 12.1 11.1 8.7 5.4–13.9
 20 Control 48 14.7 2.6–84.9 20.3 17.0 15.0 12.0–18.8 108
 20 Renal impairment 49 18.1 2.7–75.8 20.7 14.6 16.2 13.2–20.0
Renal impairment measured by eGFR
 5 Control 15 2.6 0.6–14.0 3.7 3.4 2.8 1.9–4.1 107
 5 Renal impairment 4 3.7 1.1–5.7 3.6 2.1 3.0 1.4–6.2
 10 Control 136 5.2 0.5–28.8 7.1 5.9 5.3 4.6–6.0 121
 10 Renal impairment 37 5.7 0.7–41.0 9.5 9.3 6.4 4.7–8.6
 15 Control 17 9.1 1.3–32.2 10.0 8.0 7.5 5.0–11.0
 15 Renal impairment 1 36.6 36.6 36.6
 20 Control 75 18.3 2.6–84.9 22.7 16.8 17.5 14.8–20.8 60.2
 20 Renal impairment 22 11.3 2.7–30.9 13.1 7.9 10.5 7.8–14.2

The control group includes patients with no renal impairment or with mild renal impairment, and the renal impairment group includes patients with moderate or severe renal impairment

CI confidence interval, CL CR creatinine clearance, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate