Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1881–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.766

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Modeling of the Electrophysiological Consequences of Pitx2c Deficiency

(A) Propagated action potentials (top) simulated with the Courtemanche–Ramirez–Nattel model modified to reflect the more positive RMP of murine Pitx2c+/– atria and the effect of 60% sodium current (INa) block at pacing cycle lengths of 500 and 1,000 ms, with 2-min pre-pacing, and corresponding time courses of the product of the 2 inactivation gates h and j of INa(bottom), reflecting INa availability. (B) Reduced sodium conductance (gNa) increased post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) in the reference model and the Pitx2c deficiency model. After reducing gNa, PRR was greater in the Pitx2c deficiency model than in the reference model (grey lines). Lines denote APD60(blue) and ERP (orange: with 100% gNa; grey: with 40% gNa). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.