Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;22(39):8770–8778. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8770

Table 4.

The associations of the positive expression of p53, CA19-9 and CEA proteins with basal cell hyperplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and esophageal squamous cell cancer [OR (95%CI)]

Variables ESCC HGD LGD BCH
p53
Model 11 4.51 (2.38-8.59) 4.50 (2.07-9.78) 2.21 (1.21-4.06) 1.50 (0.71-3.15)
Model 22 4.52 (2.17-4.92) 4.88 (2.10-11.33) 2.31 (1.17-4.56) 1.60 (0.72-3.57)
CA19-9
Model 11 15.15 (7.45-30.84) 7.99 (3.53-18.10) 1.57 (0.81-3.04) 1.60 (0.72-3.54)
Model 22 23.57 (9.27-56.86) 12.01 (4.61-31.32) 2.05 (0.91-4.63) 1.99 (0.81-4.93)
CEA
Model 11 11.80 (4.49-31.05) 7.50 (2.56-22.00) 2.96 (1.13-7.76) 1.52 (0.46-5.02)
Model 22 17.40 (4.76-63.59) 11.06 (2.80-43.71) 3.80 (1.06-13.66) 1.81 (0.41-7.96)
Three biomarkers combined3
Model 11 14.19 (7.21-27.91) 8.57 (3.80-19.30) 2.40 (1.38-4.15) 1.98 (1.02-3.85)
Model 22 16.64 (7.68-36.05) 10.11 (4.20-24.32) 2.59 (1.38-4.86) 2.15 (1.04-4.45)
1

In the regression model, ORs were calculated without adjustments for any variables;

2

In the regression model, ORs were calculated after adjustment for age, school year, income per year-person, smoking, alcohol drinking, and family history of esophageal cancer;

3

If the expression of any one of the three biomarkers was positive, the combined expression was counted as positive; if there was an overlap in expression, the score of the strongest expression was taken as the score of the combination. ESCC: Esophageal squamous cell cancer; HGD: High-grade dysplasia; LGD: Low-grade dysplasia; BCH: Basal cell hyperplasia.