Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 18;9(10):1480–1486. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.10.19

Table 3. Summary of the ten studies included in this Meta-analysis with regard to the smoking status and dry eye risk.

First author Year Country Population Study design Age range (a) n Smoking exposure status OR (95% CI) Adjusted age and gender
Uchino[7] 2009 Japan Office workers who use visual display terminals Cross-sectional survey 22-60 3549 Current 0.77 (0.53-1.12) Y
Sahai[8] 2005 India Hospital-based population Cross-sectional survey >20 500 Current 1.42 (0.89-2.27) -
Moss[10] 2008 USA Population-based Cohort study 43-86 2414 Current 0.89 (0.65-1.20) -
Ever 1.06 (0.86-1.30) -
Chia[11] 2003 Australia Population-based Cross-sectional survey ≥49 1075 Current 0.70 (0.40-1.10) Y
Lee[12] 2002 Indonesia Households Cross-sectional survey ≥21 1058 Current 1.50 (1.00-2.20) Y
Ever 1.20 (0.60-2.40) -
Moss[13] 2000 USA Population-based Cohort study 43-84 3703 Current 1.44 (1.13-1.83) Y
Ever 1.16 (0.96-1.39) -
Uchino[14] 2013 Japan Office workers who use visual display terminals Cross-sectional survey 22-65 561 Current 0.86 (0.54-1.35) Y
Xiao[17] 2011 China Smoker and non-smoker (man) Cross-sectional survey 25-75 2385 Current 2.24 (1.78-2.81) -
Su[18] 2012 China Students Cross-sectional survey 19-26 1168 Current 2.57 (1.41-4.67) -
Hua[21] 2014 China Population-based Cross-sectional survey 12-88 2600 Current 2.26 (1.50-3.40) Y