Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;5(3-4):140–147. doi: 10.1159/000446969

Table 2.

Clinical and radiological comparison between patients with and without ASPECTS_agreement

AD AA p value
Age (mean ± SD), years 72±15 65±13 0.11
Female/male 9/6 31/19 0.89
Hypertension 10/15 31/50 0.74
Atrial fibrillation 6/15 13/50 0.30
Diabetes mellitus 3/15 10/50 1.00
CHD 2/15 6/50 1.00
Dyslipidemia 7/15 18/50 0.46
Statin therapy 6/15 17/50 0.71
Previous stroke 1/15 11/50 0.27
Glycemia (mean ± SD), mg/dl 122±34 130±53 0.61
Systolic blood pressure at onset (mean ± SD), mm Hg 150±29 144±34 0.58
Diastolic blood pressure at onset (mean ± SD), mm Hg 81±14 78±17 0.57
Time to CT (mean ± SD), min 150±141 244±137 0.02*
Time to CT <120 min 10/15 7/42 <0.01*
Site of vessel occlusion 0.25
 MCA-M1 7/15 23/50
 MCA-M2 2/15 11/50
 Proximal ICA 0/15 6/50
 Terminal ICA 6/15 10/50
Recanalization (TICI score 2b–3) 12/15 39/50 1.00
Final infarct volume on 24 h CT (mean ± SD), ml 55±74 24±35 <0.01*
3-month mRS score <3 6/15 24/50 0.77

AD = ASPECTS disagreement; AA = ASPECTS agreement; CHD = coronary artery disease; TOAST = trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.

*

p < 0.05 statistical significance for intergroup differences. It was assessed by Pearson's χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and by Student t test for continuous variables.