Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;6:35890. doi: 10.1038/srep35890

Table 4. Comparison of percutaneous drainage and surgical incision and drainage in giant abscess.

Variables Percutaneous drainage (n = 14) Surgical incision and drainage (n = 17) P value
Age (years) 58 (28–78) 59 (13–77) 0.959
Multiple abscess (≥2) 4 (28.6%) 3 (17.6%) 0.469
Abscess cavity seperation 6 (42.9%) 9 (52.9%) 0.576
Leucocytes >10 × 109/L 10(71.4%) 10(58.8%) 0.707
Hemoglobin <120 g/L 11(78.6%) 12(70.6%) 0.698
Platelet count <100 × 109/L 2(14.3%) 2(11.8%) 1.000
Alanine transaminase >40 U/L 5(35.7%) 8(47.1%) 0.484
Aspartate transaminase >40 U/L 6(42.9%) 9(52.9%) 0.715
Total bilirubin >17 μmol/L 8(57.1%) 8(47.1%) 0.730
Albumin <35 g/L 13 (92.9%) 15 (88.2%) 1.000
Complications 5 (35.7%) 13 (76.4%) 0.022
 Bile leakage 0 3 (17.6%) 0.098
 Intraperitoneal bleeding 1 (7.1%) 4 (23.5%) 0.217
 Pulmonary infection 1 (7.1%) 2 (11.8%) 0.665
 Pleural effusion with drainage 3 (21.4%) 7 (41.2%) 0.242
Re–treatments 3 (21.4%) 0 0.045
Hospital stay (days) 12 (4–36) 29 (14–61) 0.024
Cured 14 (100%) 17 (100%) 1.000