Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2016 Aug;106(8):2110–2144. doi: 10.1257/aer.20151080

Table 4.

Allocation across Conditions

Measure \ Condition (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Static Allocation
Dynamic Allocation
AMI HF Pneu Hip/Knee AMI HF Pneu Hip/Knee
Risk-Adjusted Survival
Coef on Survival Rate 17.496
(0.995)
15.360
(1.320)
5.140
(0.777)
1.533
(0.379)
0.774
(0.501)
1.220
(0.354)
Hospitals 2,890 4,023 4,325 2,890 4,023 4,325
Risk-Adjusted Readmission
Coef on Readmission Rate −9.162
(1.621)
−10.346
(1.782)
0.499
(1.575)
−21.037
(2.027)
−1.428
(0.611)
−2.300
(0.651)
−1.138
(0.679)
−1.112
(0.836)
Hospitals 2,322 3,904 4,264 2,632 2,322 3,904 4,264 2,632
Process of Care Z-Score
Coef on Process Z-Score 0.319
(0.026)
0.332
(0.016)
0.211
(0.015)
0.048
(0.010)
0.043
(0.009)
0.026
(0.009)
Hospitals 2,398 3,666 3,920 2,398 3,666 3,920
Patient Survey Z-Score
Coef on Survey Z-Score −0.321
(0.052)
−0.252
(0.038)
−0.210
(0.030)
0.057
(0.051)
−0.065
(0.015)
−0.003
(0.011)
0.007
(0.011)
0.037
(0.022)
Hospitals 3,498 3,598 3,610 3,061 3,498 3,598 3,610 3,061

The static allocation results are estimated using equation (1), a hospital-level regression of log-patients in 2008 on market fixed effects and the quality measure named in the row. The dynamic allocation results are estimated using equation (2), which is an identical regression except for the dependent variable, which is now growth in patients from 2008 to 2010. Growth is defined as in equation (3). Standard errors are bootstrapped with 300 replications and are clustered at the market level. Risk-adjusted survival and readmission are reported in percentage points (e.g. a value of 0.1 is 10 percentage points); process of care and patient survey metrics are reported in standard deviation units (e.g. a value of 1 is 1 standard deviation).